Barely Significant
← all phrases

“only marginally significant”

5,077 sentences · 5,077 papers · 5,448 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<1.0p=0.9

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Similar to the findings in study 1, Slovenian students who maximized had greater intentions to start entrepreneurial ventures; however, the relationship was only marginally significant, suggesting that maximizing students in Slovenian may not be as likely to pursue entrepreneurship as those in the U.S.
An evaluation of the differences in knowledge of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines resulted in statistically significant differences in those who were vaccinated post-survey compared with those unvaccinated, in their COVID-19 knowledge ( p = 0.0005) and vaccine-related knowledge ( p = 0.0033), although differences between these two groups were only marginally significant at the time of the survey, as summarized in Table 1 .
The apparent detection of purifying selection upon analysis of the camp2 gene using FEL and REL tests provides some support for this alternate view, at least for this locus; with tly we did also find some suggestion of negative selection with the REL test, but this was at best limited and only marginally significant.
However, contrary to species richness, there was a declining trend in ENS PIE in 100 m 2 with increasing grazing intensity, although the effect was only marginally significant (Tables S3 and S4 , Figure 2v ). 3.5 Total Plant Cover We found a hump‐shaped relationship between total plant cover and species richness at both grain sizes and a U‐shaped relationship with β richness (Figure S4 ).
Furthermore, post-hoc analysis of these results revealed that the overall pre-post increase in these variables was significantly greater than zero for moderate-load-start participants ( Accuracy change = 11.92, 95% CI [7.86,15.98]; Optimality change = 13.24, 95% CI [9.05,17.42]), but not significant (accuracy) or only marginally significant (optimality) for low-load-start participants ( Accuracy change = 2.66, 95% CI [−1.17,6.48]; Optimality change = 4.53, 95% CI [.59,8.48]).