Likewise, DNMT3B overexpression indicated poor overall survival and reduced disease-free months, but the latter was on the borderline of significance ( P = 0.026 and P = 0.065) [Figure 1 D].
← all phrases
“on the borderline of significance”
Sighted at
p=0.0699
In the literature
2 , asymptotic P = .028 or exact P = .030 assessed), while CpGs 1, 2, and 4 were all on the borderline of significance ( Fig. 2 , asymptotic P = .045 or exact P = .052).
At a height of 6 mm, an increase in soft tissue thickness was also noted in both groups, but in the group without flap preparation it was on the borderline of significance ( p = 0.0488).
The association of diabetes with urinary DMAs III was statistically significant (p = 0.04) when diabetes was classified only by 2HBG≥200 and reported diagnosis or medication, but and on the borderline of significance (p = 0.05) when FBG≥126 mg/dL was used (Additional file 4 ).
Non-working individuals experienced more severe stress (22.21) than working ones (18.27); however, the difference was on the borderline of significance (p=0.05).
This specific change resulted in a predictive effect of agency on the slope of commitment making that was on the borderline of significance, β = 0.16, p = 0.050, but no other changes.
Across the 7 SNPs, only 1 haplotype was strongly associated with the disease (A G G C T C T, in the order of SNPs listed above), again only in females ( P = .0015), and 1 was on the borderline of significance (G G G C T C T; P = .05).
Finally, female doctors scored on average higher than males in factor 1 reflecting physicians’ perceptions for the consequences of the pandemic on medical training; however, this finding was on the borderline of significance ( p = 0.05). 4.
Thus, BCRP coverage decreases in the kidneys (from 67 to 58%, p < 0.05), but increases in the liver (from 33 to 49%, p < 0.001), and in the small intestine (from 42 to 51%, on the borderline of significance) and large intestine (from 39 to 52%, p < 0.05).
The statistical difference between the control and GBP-L groups was on the borderline of significance (p=0.051).
Finally, the difference in the prevalence of CD3−CD56+CD16+ NK cells between HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients was reduced after adjusting for age but it was still on the borderline of significance ( P = 0.052) ( Table 2 ).
The systematic error between SPECT WR CNN and planar WR BC was on the borderline of significance as shown in Bland–Altman plots ( p = 0.052).
Overall differences in shear stress in all cross-sections were on the borderline of significance according to the Mann–Whitney test ( p = 0.0527).
HbA1c remained a significant predictor in the liraglutide group ( p = 0.013) and on the borderline of significance when evaluated versus placebo ( p = 0.053), adjusting for sagittal abdominal diameter.
Table 5: Effects After Removal of Model 3 Effect Sizes and p-Values: The F-values and p-values for the effects of the armed condition on various emotions show that while state anger and trait unpleasantness are significantly affected, trait anger's p-value is on the borderline of significance (p = 0.054).
No significant difference was observed between the control group and HS group ( P = 0.16), while lower ARNT2 expression was observed in CO group compared with control group only on the borderline of significance ( P = 0.054).
ECR rate was significantly higher in patients with clinically smaller tumors (OR = 2.7, p = 0.002), unifocal type (OR = 4.0, p = 0.035), and on the borderline of significance with Ki-67 proliferative index ≥65% (OR = 1.8, p = 0.054).
In placental samples from IUGR subjects, we observed an increase in 8-oxodG levels that was on the borderline of significance (median 8-oxodG/10 5 dG = 2.03, range, 0.29–6.17; median 8-oxodG/10 5 dG = 1.74, range, 0.20–6.50 for IUGR and non-IUGR samples, respectively; p = 0.055).
The difference between the CCT and UCT arms is on the borderline of significance ( p = .055).
This effect was less visible in the case of EEN treatment when the reduction in the number of fungi was on the borderline of significance ( p = 0.056) (Fig. 2 ).
The result was on the borderline of significance ( p = 0.056), which may result from the small size of the group.
Frontal Log Power In the frontal area, the condition × frequency interaction was on the borderline of significance, F (2.86, 54.3) = 2.70, p = 0.058, η 2 p = 0.12.
s (litters) with at least one of the above listed skeletal alterations. dThese data were analyzed statistically. *Statistically different from controls p S (0.05) chi-square table and Fisher's exact test (one-tailed). compared to the controls; however, the number of litters involved, though on the borderline of significance (p = 0.058), was not different from the controls.
The difference was on the borderline of significance (P = 0.058, Table 2 , Additional file 4 ).
History of dementia was on the borderline of significance, being greater in deceased patients than in living patients at the moment of the study [61(50.4%) vs. 27(36.5%)], p = 0.058.