Barely Significant
← all phrases

“of borderline significance”

2,625 sentences · 2,625 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

DDT showed a significant trend for NHL risk with life-time days of use RR = 1.0 (ref), 1.3 (0.9–1.8), 1.1 (0.7–1.7), 1.7 (1.1–2.6); p trend = 0.02, while the intensity weighted lifetime days of use of DDT was of borderline significance: RR = 1.0 (ref), 1.2 (0.8–1.8), 1.1 (0.8–1.7), 1.6 (1.0–2.3); p trend = 0.06.
FDR p-values <0.05 differ significantly between diagnostic groups; however, because this is an exploratory hypothesis generating study of a small sample size, after stratification by gender and tumor histological subtype, FDR p-values between 0.10 and 0.05 were considered to be of borderline significance. 3.
Multivariate regression analysis taking into account key determinant factors of AC identified capsular effraction (OR = 2.31, p = 0.028) and involved SN > 2(OR = 8.16, p = 0.081) as significant or of borderline significance predictors of NSN involvement (Table 6 ) .
14 Given the limitation of borderline significance due to the inadequate recruitment related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the research team decided to recruit more participants with clinical setting as a major comparison for this work, and hence the aim of this project.
The sentence has been amended by pointing out that numbers are small and the aOR from the sensitivity analysis have been added so that the readers can see the association for hypertension is of borderline significance: Line 222-223: “In the sensitivity analysis, there was some evidence that asthma and hypertension specifically increased the risk of admission, although the numbers in some groups were small (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.25-3.58 and aOR 3.63, 95% CI 0.99 – 13.30 respectively, Table S3).” line 255 when noting symptomatic SARS and pregnancy loss less than 24 weeks , if the authors do not wish to add the historical comparison can they explain why that is not used.
Multivariable Cox regression modeling was used to determine whether the association between these five proteins with outcome was independent of potential confounders, including age, gender, race, stage (IA and IB), and smoking status (Table 2 ): IL-6 (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.14-4.79) and IL-17A (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.02-4.32) were independently associated with outcome, CRP (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.90-3.65); was of borderline significance after adjustment for race, which is possibly a reflection of the differential expression of CRP by race [ 25 ].