“not quite statistically significant”

Furthermore, the word "quasi" is indicated in gray when the result is almost but not quite statistically significant (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

4 B), although the regression slope was not quite statistically significant ( P = 0.10).

Interestingly, targets that were bound uniquely by AP2-G rather than in overlapping regions with a second transcription factor, AP2-I, were also overrepresented although not quite statistically significant ( P < 0.1).

After adjusting for oversampling of deceased patients and patient characteristics, the decrease in preventable adverse event rate between 2008 and 2012 was still noteworthy (30%), but not quite statistically significant (p=0.10 after adjustment).

The levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, CCL2, were, on the contrary, readily detectable and showed a median decrease post-treatment, although not quite statistically significant ( P = 0.11) ( Fig. 3B ) .

16%, a difference that is not quite statistically significant by a one-tailed Fisher Exact Test, P = 0.11).

As shown in Figure 4 , the post hoc analysis show that the reaction time (for alerting score) of the control group had increased from pre-test and post-test, and the difference was approaching to but not quite statistically significant [Adjusted Mean pre (SE)=16.51 (3.36); Adjusted Mean post (SE)=22.34 (3.00), p=0.11]; on the contrary, the reaction time (for alerting score) of the experimental group significantly decreased from pre-test to post-test [Adjusted Mean pre (SE)=27.08 (3.32); Adjusted Mean post (SE)=19.34 (2.97), p =0.04] with a medium effect size (Cohen’s ƒ =0.32).

Here, AMR-aware attitudes remained negatively associated with antibiotics use in healthy birds, but this relationship was not quite statistically significant ( p = 0.113 and p = 0.120).

22 noted patients with cancer (not specific to lung) who received antitumor treatment, ICI, chemotherapy, radiation, or tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment within 14 days before COVID-19 diagnosis developed severe events defined as admission to ICU, requiring mechanical ventilation, or death, with a hazard ratio equal to 2.38 (95% CI: 0.80–7.04), although it was not quite statistically significant ( p = 0.118).

0,46)), although this small change is not quite statistically significant ( p = 0.16).

We also noted a decreasing trend between groups 1 and 3 (29.9 ± 3.0%), although this was not quite statistically significant ( P = 0.2; Table 1 ).

Although the relative reduction in MT growth speed when TACC3 is overexpressed is only slightly less compared to controls and is not quite statistically significant (0.91 ± 0.06 n = 21 versus control 0.82 ± 0.04 n = 22, ns p = 0.2, Fig. 2a ’), for other MT growth parameters, TACC3 OE significantly dampens the nocodazole-induced reduction in lifetime (0.99 ± 0.047 n = 21 versus control 0.86 ± 0.03 n = 22, * p = 0.03, Fig. 2b ’) and length (0.91 ± 0.08 n = 21 versus control 0.68 ± 0.04 n = 22, * p = 0.01, Fig. 2c ’) compared to controls.

The ratio of (CC + CT)/TT and CC/(CT + TT) among diabetes patient were substantially higher than that of control respondents, although the difference for CC/(CT + TT) was not quite statistically significant (OR = 1.68, p = .33; RR = 1.18, p = .25), but the higher ratio for (CC + CT)/TT was statistically significant (OR = 1.79, p = .01; RR = 1.23, p = .01).

Our results showed that, although not quite statistically significant, mtDNA‐CN levels were lower in PSP‐P patients compared to PSP‐RS patients ( p = 0.34) (Figure 4 ).

Although the TAFI levels were not quite statistically significant (P = 0.508), their levels were similar to overt hyperthyroidism and, additionally, there were low number of cases assessed in the study.

Indeed, deletion of DIG2 lessened the effect of Ste12 overexpression on Fus3 localization, although the difference between the RNCF data sets was not quite statistically significant (data not shown).

The association between education and the cardiometabolic pattern was however not quite statistically significant.

The same difference was observed at dinner describing a p value (0.050) close to but not quite statistically significant as supporting a trend toward statistical significance. 3.4.

Due to the small sample size, this observation with a log rank p value of 0.0854 was not quite statistically significant, nevertheless, without missing to establish an expedited time of symptomatic relief from COVID-19 with only Ayurvedic treatment.

Though it was not quite statistically significant, subjects who completed the name task were at a relative disadvantage at detecting color changes, as compared to subjects who described the color of the objects ( U = 169, p < .07).

The reduction in daytime cough frequency of 32% over placebo (primary endpoint) was not quite statistically significant but taste adverse effects were only reported in 6.4% of patients.

For ENPP2 and PPAP2A we observed no such association, but for PPAP2B there was some evidence that lower expression may be associated with reduced overall survival, although this was not quite statistically significant.

Although not quite statistically significant, the levels of IL-2, IL-4 and TNF-α also tended to be higher in Pink1 −/− mice.

A similar pattern was observed in the old female mice; the E max value was significantly lower in the group of mice that had received 0.05 mg/kg C 60 fullerenes (37.8% (95% CI: 32.6–43.0%)) compared to the control group (60.4% (95% CI: 53.2–67.6%)), whereas the E max value for the high dose exposed group was reduced (47.3% (95% CI: 38.6–56.0%)) although the difference was not quite statistically significant at a 5% level.

There was also an increased risk of suicidal consideration among those with increased desire for a sexual relationship, though not quite statistically significant (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.72), and with increased desire for a domestic partnership or civil union (OR = 1.39, 95% CI; 1.04, 1.86).