“not as significant”

3 B, D, indicated that, although the advantage in OS and EFS for the low-risk group over the high-risk group was not as significant as in the internal training group, it still showed a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.014 and P = 0.033).

While the difference was not as significant as that in the overall group, the eGFR decrease in the TAF group remained smaller compared to that in the ETV group ( p = 0.047) among males.