Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 0.0008970.0× alphagold
In exploratory follow-up analyses without correction for multiple testing, we observed nominally significant associations contralateral in the left OFC ( k = 20, F = 11.15, p = 0.000897, uncorrected, p = 0.606, FWE-corrected) and also in the right lateral occipital cortex ( k = 133, F = 12.7, p = 0.0003968, uncorrected, p = 0.364, FWE-corrected).
nominally significantP = 9×10 −40.0× alphagold
However, for three genes, the strength of association with a burden of rare variants was more significant than observed for a single variant test, and in each case, a second nominally significant SNP was observed; LIPG p.Arg476Trp for HDL cholesterol (MAF = 0.18%, P = 9×10 −4 ), LIPC p.Arg208His for LDL cholesterol (MAF = 0.16%, P = 0.02), and ANGPTL4 p.Arg336Cys for triglycerides (MAF = 0.24%, P = 0. 01).
nominally significantP = 9.65 × 10 −40.0× alphagold
Heterozygous carriers of INHBE pLOF variants (1 in 587 individuals, combined frequency of 0.08%) had a favorable metabolic profile consisting of nominally significant associations with lower triglycerides ( P = 9.65 × 10 −4 , Beta = −0.13 SD), higher HDL cholesterol ( P = 0.01, Beta = 0.10 SD), decreased alanine aminotransferase ( P = 0.04, Beta = −0.08 SD) and lower fasting glucose ( P = 0.03, Beta = −0.17 SD).
nominally significantp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
3.2.1 COPD We identified a nominally statistical association between CHRNA3 rs1051730 and COPD risk under the allelic and dominant models in all populations (allelic model: OR = 1.630, 95% CI = 1.293–2.054, p < 0.001; dominant model: OR = 1.662, 95% CI = 1.300–2.124, p < 0.001), a nominally significant association under the allelic and dominant models in Asians (allelic model: OR = 1.591, 95% CI = 1.204–2.103, p = 0.001; dominant model: OR = 1.625, 95% CI = 1.222–2.160, p = 0.001), and a null association under all three models in Caucasians.
nominally significantP <.0010.0× alphagold
Among the 49 patients in the intervention group and 51 in the control group undergoing postoperative chemotherapy, a nominally significant improvement in the change from baseline in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 total score at 3 months was observed compared to the control group (difference of 4.42; P <.001).
nominally significantp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
For cg23893460, the primary IVW method yielded a nominally significant positive association (OR = 1.29, p < 0.001); however, this was not consistently replicated across other MR methods (all p > 0.05), limiting confidence in this finding.
nominally significantP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis identified 128 nominally significant enriched terms (see Table S3 for genes included in the analysis) for the DMPs ( P < 0.001) identified in the age 10 analysis, including several related to the etiology of psychosis, such as glutamatergic synaptic transmission (GO:0051966, P = 0.0034) and neuron projection development (GO:0031175, P = 0.0064).