Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantP = 0.00120.0× alphagold
In the non-EA participants (137 cases, 120 controls), rs17538288 remained nominally significant (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.22; P = 0.0012 ) and rs7546189 did not (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.87; P = 0.33 ).
Genome-wide Association Study for AKI.
Kidney360 · 2023 · PMC10371295
nominally significantP = 0.00130.0× alphagold
In the ‘protein domains’ category tested using the Interpro database as the source, the term ‘epidermal growth factor like domain’ showed a nominally significant enrichment with P = 0.0013, Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate corrected P = 0.073.
nominally significantp -value = 1.4 × 10 −30.0× alphagold
Rs3745842 major allele (G) was more frequent in cases compared to controls, although the association was nominally significant after multiple testing correction ( p -value = 1.4 × 10 −3 , corrected p -value = 0.081) ( Supplementary Table 6 ). 3.2 LoF mutations in ABCA7 LoF mutations in ABCA7 have been recently reported as main mechanism explaining the GWAS signal and the increased susceptibility to AD.
nominally significantP = 0.00150.0× alphagold
Results Genetic correlations Using genome-wide LD score regression analyses, we found non-significant negative genetic correlation ( r g ) between neuroticism and BMI ( r g = −0.0174 (SE 0.0213), P = 0.413) and HDL ( r g = −0.0216 (SE 0.0244), P = 0.3765) and positive genetic correlation with neuroticism that was nominally significant for CAD ( r g = 0.0919 (SE 0.0289), P = 0.0015), TG ( r g = 0.0367 (SE 0.0182), P = 0.0432), WHR ( r g = 0.065 (SE 0.0269), P = 0.0159), and non-significant for DBP ( r g = 0.0333 (SE 0.0272), P = 0.2209), SBP ( r g = 0.0426 (SE 0.025), P = 0.0893), CRP ( r g = 0.0313 (SE 0.0273), P = 0.2526), CIGPRDAY ( r g = 0.0445 (SE 0.0572), P = 0.4371), T2D ( r g = 0.0377 (SE 0.0337), P = 0.2638), LDL ( r g = 0.0308 (SE 0.026), P = 0.2351), and TC ( r g = 0.0333 (SE 0.0256), P = 0.1936) (Suppl.
nominally significantp=0.001750.0× alphagold
In addition, because CD4T and CD8T showed nominally significant associations with hsCRP, we also tested these interactions in chronic pain and found that CD4T, but not CD8T, positively interacted with hsCRP (beta=2.5, p=0.00175; n=820; Figure 1E ) in chronic pain.