Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly statistically significant”

324 sentences · 324 papers · 421 search hits before verification

In the literature

A nearly statistically significant positive correlation was also found between attitude score and comfort level when offering genetic testing for scenario 5 ( r = 0.15, p = 0.06), revealing that more positive attitudes toward deaf people correlate with greater comfort offering genetic testing to a culturally Deaf couple who wishes to have a deaf child.
In the Spinal Cord Injury Thromboprophylaxis Investigators (SCITI) trial, 20 patients in the LMWH-only group experienced fewer PE events compared to patients in the UFH plus IPC group (5.2% and 18.4%, respectively); this difference was nearly statistically significant (RD = 13.2, 95% CI = 0.9 to 25.4; RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.98; P = .06).
These results suggest that the patients with unexplained infertility have more suboptimal centrioles than fertile men in their high-quality sperm fraction, a finding that is nearly statistically significant (3/10, versus 0/10, P = 0.06). 3.4. 40% of unexplained infertility patients had lower quality centrioles in the lower quality sperm fraction than those of fertile lower quality sperm individuals We also tested if reduced centriolar quality could be detected when comparing lower quality sperm from men with unexplained infertility with lower quality sperm from fertile men.
Our observed associations for inattentiveness remained similar after this adjustment in terms of their direction; however, these associations became weaker and lost their statistical significance with the exception of the association for the left prefrontal area, which remained nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.06 ).
In the repeated measures model of WOMAC total scores, there was a nearly statistically significant interaction between number of days on the website and follow-up visit (estimate per day on website = − 0.008, 95% CI = − 0.02 – 0.00, p = 0.06; Table 3 ).
Subgroup analysis RFA mode Subgroup analysis according to the RFA mode (monopolar, n=17; bipolar, n=29, Table 1 ) revealed a better necrotic rate in the bipolar group, which was nearly statistically significant (92.8% vs 81.25%, n=26/28 vs 13/16, P =0.06), with a slightly lower recurrence rate (35.7% vs 37.5%, n=10/28 vs 6/16); however, six of the ten (60%) patients among the bipolar group were treated with RFA again, with four complete responses (66.7%).