Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly statistically significant”

324 sentences · 324 papers · 421 search hits before verification

In the literature

When analyses were repeated with adjustment for age, sex, race, and baseline physical activity level, the result for the outcome of 12‐month change in physical activity level measured by accelerometer became nearly statistically significant (mean 12‐month difference between the intervention and control groups=+114.1 activity units; 95% CI=−3.0 to +231.3; P =0.056) and the result for patient‐reported blocks walked in the past week was no longer statistically significant (mean 12‐month difference between the intervention and control groups=+12.6 blocks; 95% CI=−2.6 to +27.8; P =0.104).
While the ANOVA was non-significant for a group difference in pumps, it can be seen in Figure 2 A that seniors had a larger number of pumps in the high risk condition compared to young participants [in fact, this difference was nearly statistically significant in the high risk condition: t (51) = 1.95, p = 0.056, but not in the low risk condition: t < 1].
Conversely, at the 10 −3 and 10 −4 concentrations, the number of plaques increased to 11 ± 2 and 8 ± 3, respectively, with a nearly statistically significant difference at the 10 −3 concentration ( p = 0.056).
A subset analysis for non-palliative care clinicians using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests indicated a statistically non-significant difference in the number of visits flagged between phases 2 and 3 but nearly statistically significant differences for clinician-level activity counts (p=0.0579) and activity rates (ie, activity as a proportion of visits flagged) (p=0.0625), where statistical significance is defined with an alpha of 0.05 (supporting details in online supplemental appendix S6 ).