Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
Smoking IUI with donor semen and female smoking Univariate statistical analysis showed that CPR in women smoking 15 cigarettes or more daily was significantly lower compared to women smoking 1-14 cigarettes daily (p=0.01) and there was a nearly significant lower CPR compared with non- smoking women (p=0.05), ( Table I , Fig. 1A ).
nearly significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Most importantly, healing time, which is a highly significant clinical endpoint for the diabetic population under investigation, was also significantly improved in the PCB group (5.2 ± 2.7 mo vs 7.7 ± 3.9 mo, P = 0.005), while complete wound healing rate at 1 year was nearly significant in the PCB group (89.4% vs 74.5%, P = 0.05).
nearly significantp<.051.0× alphagold
Looking at the model in which different trajectories predict scores (model C), when compared to the low symptom trajectory pupils with increasing trajectories demonstrated significant or nearly significant negative co-efficients of change in attainment (increasing low-moderate β = −.05, p<.05, ES = .07; increasing low-high β = −.18, p<.10, ES = .20).
nearly significantp > 0.051.0× alphagold
However, this difference is only nearly significant ( F = 3.752; p > 0.05) with a small effect size ( d = 0.10), whereas, as regards the relationship with teacher score, significant differences were found with primary school children that score better than secondary school children ( F = 7.647; p < 0.01) with small effect size ( d = 0.14).
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Also at the beginning of the study, the median sIgE value in response to rMal d 1 was 0.99 kU/L (range 0.04–94.60 kU/L) The patients showed a significant decrease of the median sIgE in response to Bet v 1 (10.60 to 5.19 kU/L; p = 0.01) and a nearly significant decrease of sIgE in response to rMal d 1 (0.99 to 0.61 kU/L; p = 0.05) after 2 years of BP-AIT ( Figure 2 ).