Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
3.6 Post study assessment of future need There was a nearly significant difference between the groups in distribution of the need for poststudy care ( p = 0.050), with more participants directly resuming ordinary maintenance care in the surgery group than in the laser group, who in greater extent needed an extra follow‐up visit (Table 5 ). 4 DISCUSSION The present study could neither establish equivalence between the conventional surgery and diode laser treatment of peri‐implantitis, regarding mean changes in PPD and MBL, nor demonstrate significant differences in clinical, radiographical, immunological, and microbiological outcomes.
nearly significantP = 0.051.0× alphagold
Most importantly, healing time, which is a highly significant clinical endpoint for the diabetic population under investigation, was also significantly improved in the PCB group (5.2 ± 2.7 mo vs 7.7 ± 3.9 mo, P = 0.005), while complete wound healing rate at 1 year was nearly significant in the PCB group (89.4% vs 74.5%, P = 0.05).
nearly significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Controlling for age, education level, gender, and diet, using a general linear model, these relationships with MP 0.25° remained significant or nearly significant for the majority of the tests ( p = 0.050 for FAS test, p = 0.040 for AST percent correct, p = 0.039 for PAL Total Errors, and p = 0.095 for PAL Total Errors at Stage 6) but the relationship with animal fluency was no longer significant ( p = 0.776).
nearly significantp > 0.051.0× alphagold
However, this difference is only nearly significant ( F = 3.752; p > 0.05) with a small effect size ( d = 0.10), whereas, as regards the relationship with teacher score, significant differences were found with primary school children that score better than secondary school children ( F = 7.647; p < 0.01) with small effect size ( d = 0.14).