Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantp = 0.05471.1× alphagold
When comparing the means between the KOOS pain quartiles, the difference in CGRP levels were nearly significant, with higher mean concentration in the high-pain group (low pain: 24.7 ± 16.2 pg/mL versus high pain: 40.7 ± 23.5 pg/mL; p = 0.0547) (Figure 2E ). 2-AG and AEA levels in SF LC-MS/MS analysis of endocannabinoids in SF revealed significantly higher levels of 2-AG in patients in the high-pain group (20.9 ± 10.3 ng/mL) compared to the low-pain group (14.9 ± 7.1 ng/mL) (p = 0.0358) (Figure 3A ).
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
A main effect of task was also nearly significant ( F (2,220) = 2.94, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.01), with a higher percentage of anticipatory saccades occurring in the Gap task (9.33 ± 1.06%) compared to both the Step (8.12 ± 1.14%) and Overlap tasks (5.91 ± 0.87%).
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Post-hoc tests revealed significant decrease in pNN50 and pNN10%(meanRR) at 9, 12 and 24 months of age, and the decrease was nearly significant at 18 months of age ( p = 0.055), as well as at several timepoints from the age of 9 months for the HRV triangular index, signing decreased heart rate variability.
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
In SLG samples, Zn concentrations showed a nearly significant increase at 200–600 m compared to 0–200 m (8.99 vs. 7.38 mg·kg −1 f.m.; p = 0.055), while Cd levels were significantly lower at the greater distance (0.13 vs. 0.19 mg·kg −1 f.m.; p = 0.015).
nearly significantp = .0551.1× alphagold
The model for HCPs‐rated pain showed a significant main effect for the contrast T1–T2 ( β = −1.40, t = 2.34, p = .020), intervention group ( β = −2.01, t = 2.56, p = .011), age ( β = −0.36, t = 5.11, p = <.001), and a nearly significant main effect for the contrast T1–T3 ( β = −1.36, t = 1.93, p = .055) and status of liver transplantation ( β = −0.60, t = 1.70, p = .091).
nearly significantP=0.0551.1× alphagold
The presence of CEA mRNA-positive CTCs in preoperative peripheral blood samples had nearly significant impact on DFS (HR =1.9; 95% CI: 0.99–3.5; P=0.055) and CSS (HR =2; 95% CI: 0.95–4.01; P=0.067).
nearly significantp = 0.0551.1× alphagold
For the 120 min period after the second treatment, two-way ANOVA finds a main effect of amphetamine treatment ( F (1,32) = 63.791; p < 0.001), a nearly significant effect of CNO treatment ( F (1,32) = 4.027; p = 0.055), and a significant CNO treatment × amphetamine treatment interaction ( F (1,32) = 6.489; p = 0.017).