Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nearly significantP = .0541.1× alphagold
Notably, the P value for interaction was nearly significant ( P = .054) between subgroups of patients who had received previous hormonal therapy (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]) and those who had not received previous hormonal therapy (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.23]).
nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
On multivariable Cox regression, only procedure type (combined and transcranial approaches) remained significant prognosticators [HR:8.616, p = 0.004, and HR: 17.559, p = 0.017, respectively] with Kadish-Morita Stage D being nearly significant [HR:14.35, p = 0.054].
nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
As can be expected following the results above, following the intervention in English significantly larger gains are observed in English ( M = 0.27) than in Hebrew ( M = 0.05) for target words that were taught in English, t (21) = 5.93, p < 0.001, and following the intervention in Hebrew larger gains are observed in Hebrew ( M = 0.11) than in English ( M = 0.02) for target words that were taught in Hebrew, and the difference was nearly significant, t (21) = 2.04, p = 0.054.
nearly significantp =0.0541.1× alphagold
Following 7 days of treatment in subjects with MDD, a 1 : 1 ratio of BUP and SAM, the ratio associated with maximal antagonism of opioid effects, exhibited statistically significant improvement vs placebo in HAM-D17 total score ( p =0.032) and nearly significant improvement in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score ( p =0.054).
Evaluation of opioid modulation in major depressive disorder.
Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015 · PMC4397403
nearly significantP = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Also, a trending significant reduction (P = 0.10) was observed only after 2 weeks when compared to the placebo group and was further confirmed to a nearly significant level (P = 0.054; F = 3.94) using the ANCOVA model.
nearly significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
In addition, nearly significant differences ( p = 0.054) existed between the pre-exercise untrained and postexercise untrained groups, suggesting a larger magnitude of changes in human exercise-related characteristics than in those leading active lifestyles.
nearly significantp = 0.05461.1× alphagold
For patients with baseline dyskinesia, improvements over placebo were also significant ( p = 0.0153) in patients with or without changes in levodopa dose, and nearly significant ( p = 0.0546) in patients with no change in levodopa dose, suggesting that these improvements were not due to levodopa dose reductions.
nearly significantp = 0.05471.1× alphagold
When comparing the means between the KOOS pain quartiles, the difference in CGRP levels were nearly significant, with higher mean concentration in the high-pain group (low pain: 24.7 ± 16.2 pg/mL versus high pain: 40.7 ± 23.5 pg/mL; p = 0.0547) (Figure 2E ). 2-AG and AEA levels in SF LC-MS/MS analysis of endocannabinoids in SF revealed significantly higher levels of 2-AG in patients in the high-pain group (20.9 ± 10.3 ng/mL) compared to the low-pain group (14.9 ± 7.1 ng/mL) (p = 0.0358) (Figure 3A ).