Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nearly significant”

3,288 sentences · 3,288 papers · 3,853 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.0579p=0.06

Listed by Hankins, posted since · Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

[ 22 ] study showed a weak reaction (mild erythema) with neat saliva PT in 60% (3/5) of the RAS group We showed high diagnostic accuracy for 20G PT and PT with self-saliva in discriminating patients with active BD from the control group, and additional high diagnostic accuracy of PT with self-saliva for discriminating the patients with BD from non-BD, and nearly significant accuracy for discrimination between the patients with active BD and RAS.
The significant association between consumption of fast food/pizza and serum concentrations of PFOA in the 24-h recall model, and the nearly significant association in the 7-d recall model, may be explained by evidence that PFOA is more frequently detected than PFOS in fast food packaging ( Schaider et al. 2017 ) and that PFOS production began to be phased out in the United States starting in 2000, so FCMs may play a larger role for PFOA than for PFOS.
Multivariable analysis was performed for outcome variables that were statistically significant or nearly significant in univariate analysis; multiple linear regression was used for continuous variables and logistic regression was used for categorical variables.
Surgical results of third or more cardiac valve operation.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · 2015 · PMC4333857
Regarding the untreated object naming task, the atDCS-Lang group ( P = 0.025, β = +12) and the atDCS-Cog group ( P = 0.058, β = +10.2) exhibited significant and nearly significant improvements, respectively, from T0 to T1 compared with the ptDCS-Lang group, thus suggesting an effect of anodal tDCS on untreated object naming ability (see Fig. 4 ).
Uniplanar and biplanar/circular EF had similar rate of bone fusion (Unilateral = 86.1%; 95% CI 77.1 to 95.1; biplanar/circular = 89.1%; 95% CI 81.4 to 96.8), but a nearly significant difference in this outcome was detected when EF with pins (85.8%; 95% CI 77.9 to 93.7) was compared to EF with wires (94.6 95% CI 86.0 to 103.1).