Barely Significant
← all phrases

“near-significant”

2,307 sentences · 2,307 papers · 5,465 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

Two-way ANOVA demonstrated significant effects of GluN1 immunization (CA1: F (1,16) = 39.75, p < 0.001; CA3: F (1,16) = 85.68, p < 0.0001; DG: F (1,16) = 33.17, p < 0.001) and D-serine treatment (CA1: F (1,16) = 5.327, p = 0.0347; CA3: F (1,16) = 12.90, p = 0.0024; DG: F (1,16) = 5.665, p = 0.0301), with significant or near-significant interaction effects.
Following FDR correction, we identified multiple near-significant and significant associations ( q < 0.25 and 0.1, respectively; Extended Data Fig. 9b,c and Methods ), particularly when evaluating features from the immune activation/exhaustion and wound healing clusters (dedifferentiated TI-1 in PD-L1 TPS ≤ 1% q = 0.23; immune-activated M-2 in PD-L1 TPS ≤ 1% q = 0.16; macrophage/monocytes in PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% q = 0.06; hMono3 in PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% q = 0.11).
However, the near-significant change on the socio-practical domain of the ASOR-5 questionnaire for the uninformed condition combined with a large ES indicates that the instructions at randomization worked (since this near-significant difference may reflect differing attitudes based on the information given about the robot).
Even when the fraction of coupled p-MDTA allele pairs at linked microsatellites in the buffalo genome linearly decreases from a value as high as 0.8 at 24.9°S to 0.5 (expected fraction in the absence of selection) at 4.8°N, the probability of observing a significant ( α = 0.05) or near-significant ( α = 0.1) difference in average latitude with a Student’s t -test between coupled and repulsed allele pairs was only 34% and 46%, respectively (60 r LD estimates from 24 locations using 50 randomizations).