Barely Significant
← all phrases

“near-significant”

2,307 sentences · 2,307 papers · 5,465 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

near-significantP -value=6.71 × 10 −30.1× alphagold
Finally, we found a near-significant effect of antipsychotic drug use on mean caudate volume (β=0.016; P -value=6.71 × 10 −3 ), implying that caudate volume of depressed patients was greater as the percentage of patients taking antipsychotic drugs was higher ( Supplementary Figure S7 ).
near-significantp = 0.0090.2× alphagold
When a Bonferroni correction was made with statistical significance accepted at the p < 0.006 level, there was a statistically significant superiority in survival distributions for azathioprine over dapsone (χ 2 (1)=11.56; p = 0.001) as well as a near-significant superiority for MMF over dapsone (χ 2 (1)=6.83; p = 0.009) and for rituximab over dapsone (χ 2 (1)=6.20; p = 0.013).
near-significantp = 0.0090.2× alphagold
On a significant or near-significant level patients showed decreases in beta3 and gamma power after verum as compared to sham stimulation (beta3: T = 2.900; df = 19; p = 0.009; gamma: T = 2.046; df = 19; p = 0.055) whereas controls showed power increases (beta3: T = 2.072; df = 19; p = 0.052; gamma: T = 2.201; df = 19; p = 0.040).
near-significantp = 0.010.2× alphagold
For OS, significant or near-significant interactions ( p = 0.01 to 0.064) were observed for BMI and all body composition measures except IMAT, such that in the targeted therapy group, higher BMI, SAT, VAT, SM and SMI were associated with better OS (HRs 0.56 to 0.65), whereas no effect was seen in the immunotherapy group (all HRs near 1).
near-significantp = 0.010.2× alphagold
Using the Cox Proportional Hazards model, accounting for MMP-11 expression and other vital clinical and pathological prognostic factors, only two variables showed significant or near-significant associations with reduced DFS: elevated Ki67 (HR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.03–1.21], p = 0.01) and high MMP-11 expression (HR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00-1.04], p = 0.05).
near-significantp < 0.010.2× alphagold
4C , purple line), comparison of microsaccade-rate timeseries in Pre-test versus Post-test 3 still revealed one significant cluster and one near-significant cluster in the following response time windows: 1,688–2,041 ms (Fig. 4C , gray-shaded area, p < 0.01) and 2,067–2,244 ms (Fig. 4C , lightly gray-shaded area, p = 0.055), respectively.
near-significantp=0.010.2× alphagold
Significant or near-significant differences were noted for one question pertaining to vaccine attitudes/behaviors, regarding intention to get a vaccine if recommended by their doctor (p=0.01, V=0.39); one question related to vaccine knowledge, regarding need to get the influenza vaccine if received the previous year (p=0.05, V=0.18); and two questions regarding trust, namely trust in government influenza vaccination programs (p=0.04, V=0.19) and vaccine ingredients (p=0.06, V=0.18).
near-significantp = 0.0150.3× alphagold
Post hoc comparisons similarly identified significant to near significant group/genotype differences for average velocities in testing at 3, 5 and 12 months of age [t(9) = −1.50 to −3.32, p = 0.004–0.084, d = −0.48 to −1.05, Figure 2B ] and significant to near-significant group differences in distance traveled in testing at 3 and 5 months of age [t(9) = −1.56 to −2.58, p = 0.015–0.077, d = −0.49 to −0.82, Figure 2C ]. 3.4 Total time spent per maze compartments 3.4.1 Central platform From trial to trial, most rats spent about 45–55 s in the central platform of the maze.
near-significantp = 0.020.4× alphagold
Other significant or near-significant factors associated with increased risk of relapse in this model were summer birth season (aHR 1.63, CI 1.09–2.44, p = 0.02; compared with winter birth season) and treatment with mid-efficacy DMT (aHR 1.82, CI 0.93–3.55, p = 0.08; compared with no DMT use) or high-efficacy DMT (aHR 1.83, 0.92–3.64, p = 0.08; compared with no DMT use) (eTable 1, model 1).