“near significance”

However, correlations between plasma testosterone and CSB were near significance in the total sample ( r = 0.24) and significant in the subsample of men with CSB ( r = 0.28).

One limitation of the present study is a lack of power, particularly given the near significance of ADT clinical use as it relates to fiducial tracking volatility.

Additionally, we searched for "almost significant," "near significant," and "near significance." However, these terms did not add to our abstract pool.

Of the three polymorphisms in the FTO gene reported in two studies in two black South African mixed ancestry population, only rs9941349 (OR = 1.43 (1.00-2.04), p = 0.052) was near significance, associated with T2DM after adjustment for cofounders [ 56 ].

Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), uterine corpus endometrial cancers (UCECs), rectal adenocarcinoma (READ), cervical squamous cell cancers, breast cancers (BRCA) and liver hepatocellular carcinomas also all show a trend toward increased expression in mutant samples with KIRP displaying near significance (Figure S2A and B).

However, three consecutive island/promoter CpGs (cg26235537, cg10026577, cg02306970) were near significance after correction for the FDR and could constitute a VMR (variably methylated region) of positive correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.5).

In several cases, the confidence interval of these studies barely passed through zero suggesting that they were near significance, which could explain in part this finding.

This variability poses a challenge, especially for events near significance thresholds.

58 For non-coding elements, enhancer nearby TERT is ranked first in the whole-genome data set with near significance ( q = 0.32; Supplementary Table 15 ).

I would agree your findings are null even though you are near significance!

Both the α-diversity (expressed as number of OTUs) and the β-diversity (expressed with the Whittaker index) within the field-collected samples did not differ among sites, although for the latter the p -value turned out to be near significance (P α-diversity = 0.194; P β-diversity = 0.0638; Table S9 in the Supplementary Materials ).

The near significance of this result indicates that with a larger sample size or a longer duration of study, this increase might reach statistical significance, which would have important implications for the potential benefits of immunonutrition in bolstering cellular immunity.

Although such association was not seen in men, it was near significance level (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.44-1.07; P trend = 0.05).

Furthermore, PVE cases showed higher rates of 30-day mortality compared with NVE with near significance, which is likely multifactorial.

MMP-3 was increased significantly in the label-free study and increased to near significance in the QconCAT study.

As above, we attribute the near significance of this analysis to slightly under-powering our n ’s.

The emergence of parental divorce in Model II, after including 207 cases excluded from Model I due to missing parental socio-economic data, can be placed alongside the statistical significance of parental death in Model I, and its near significance in Model II.

The sex difference in December and February were statistically significant but in January it was only near significance (Supplementary Table S5 b).

In our study the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank statistics showed significance between the presence of brain metastases and progression-free survival; and near significance between the M stage and overall survival, and the LDH level was detected ( Figure 2 ).

For the Eastern region D T was negative and near significance, while Fu's F s was significantly negative ( Table 4 ).

Chi-square tests revealed that the survival status distribution differed significantly between C1 and C2 through (P < 0.05), and other factors showed near significance ( Figures 2A–F ).

Covariates used in the multivariate analysis were selected based on clinical relevance and if the p -value in the univariate analysis was <0.05 or near significance <0.1.

Decreased percentage of BAFF + CD14 + cells was near significance (p 0.06).

No other characteristics evaluated differed at or near significance between visits.

In the full cohort, the 3 contrasts that were significant before correction (≥4 vs 1-3; ≥5 vs 1-4; ≥6 vs 1-5) retained the same direction and were near significance after correction (q(BH) = 0.066 for each; Table S9) ( 12 ).