“near significance”

The between group difference of number of persons improved was near significance (p = 0.098) suggesting that the benefit of adding EMG controlled stimulation to a Task-oriented arm rehabilitation might have been proven for persons in the subacute phase after stroke if the planned sample size had been reached.

It can be considered near significance, or trend toward it, when p <.10 (<10%).

Variables demonstrating significant associations ( p < 0.05) or near significance ( p < 0.10) were considered for further modeling [ 13 ].

Multivariable binary logistic regression was then performed for all variables in the univariable analysis with a significant or near significance p < 0.1.

In South Africa, significant associations included having more friends, which was negatively associated with ART adherence, as well as near significance ( p = 0.1) for negative associations with betweenness centrality and also for the number of same-gender network members.

#30 was near significance (p = 0.1). #29 is protein synthesis and in this category most of the red symbols are genes for ribosomal proteins (chloroplast and cytoplasmic), most of the blue symbols are genes for protein modifying enzymes.

Comparative analysis of categorical variables was performed using Fisher’s exact test or a χ2-test with Yates’ correction, and continuous variables through the Mann–Whitney U -test with statistical significance (P < 0.05) or near significance (P < 0.1) were subjected to multivariate analysis using a forward stepwise logistic regression model.

In addition, ACE2 expressing AMs were also observed to significantly affect the small airway functionality FEF25–75% (r’= −0.30; p < 0.05) and near significance was seen for lung function parameter, FEV1/FVC% (r’= −0.22; p = 0.1).

When we excluded the PEACE studies, only season remained near significance ( p < 0.1).

The variables significant ( P < 0.05) or near significance ( P < 0.1) in univariate analysis were then examined as independent variables in direct multiple logistic regression, with successful weight loss maintenance as the dependent variable.

However, none of the CRE sites show significant enrichment ( Table 1 ), though three of the four are near significance (0.05<p<0.1).

Moreover, dominant effects significantly influenced total muscle fiber number (p<0.05), while the influence on muscle fiber type I composition and loin-eye area were trended to near significance (p<0.10).

- We can speak of a near significance (p < .10) with a moderate effect (R 2 = 0.052) in the absolute preference of the least attractive woman, where the results point to a greater preference for the protrusive profile among those who use the nets little/not at all (50%) and towards the retrusive profile among those who use them medium/

Statistical assessments were two tailed and considered significant at p < 0.05 and near significance at 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1.

In addition, logistic regressions models were adjusted, separately for postmenopausal women and men, with VFS (percentile 20) as dependent variable and with categorical variables that reached significance ( p < 0.05) or near significance ( p < 0.1) at the bivariate analysis as independent factors.

Variables with statistical significance ( P < 0.05) or near significance ( P < 0.1) in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.

Specifically, twelve of the variables identified through the chi-square analysis (see Table 2 ) with significant p -values ( p ≤ 0.05) were entered into a logistic regression model along with two additional variables (sufficient support from your insurers after evacuation and suffered no loss of property) which were near significance (0.05 < p < 0.10).

Furthermore, relationships between connective tissue and gastrointestinal symptoms were near significance ( p = 0.10) and the next largest observed effect (OR 1.73).

4 a) were near significance (0.05 < p < 0.10).

One study using data from four cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys from 25 European countries, Israel and the United States found that depressive symptoms were linked to reduced voting in three of the four datasets and were of near significance in the fourth (p < 0.10) 13 .

Independent risk factors for pathological fracture Variables showing significance or near significance ( P < 0.10) in the univariate analysis were entered into a binary logistic regression model.

Also, the corresponding interaction for %DMA was near significance ( p = 0.10).

This analysis included variables with statistical significance (p≤0.05) or near significance (p<0.10) from the bivariate analysis.

Subsequently, a univariate analysis was performed in order to find texture variables with statistical significance ( p -value < 0.05) or near significance (0.05 < p -value < 0.1) that are able to distinguish between CT scans with GGO lesions characterized as either malignant or benign.

Although the effects in the future CKD group were not statistically significant but near significance ( p < 0.1, Table 6) , there was a noticeable trend involving the same lipid metabolism GMF.