“near significance”

The results of gene set enrichment analysis tests indicated that treatment with I-BET151 regulated the NHEJ pathway with near significance (p = 0.08).

Based on a group-wise comparison between intervention and control groups, there was no statistically significant change in the mental health parameters, except a near significance for medium-level of happiness (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.91–2.61, p = 0.08).

However, the association between childhood trauma and psychosocial impairments was reduced to near significance ( r = 0.10, p = 0.08).

Variables exhibiting significance (p < 0.05) or near significance (p < 0.08) at univariate analysis were included into the Cox regression models.

Mutations in PIK3CA and MAP3K1 were significantly more likely to co-occur (after BH FDR correction) in the TAM dataset, and were near significance in MA12 although not after correction ( p = 0.08).

We observed near significance for improving pain symptoms among NHA compared with NHW (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 0.93 to 3.62]; P = .080; Table 3 ).

Confusion and cough were near significance: cough (adjusted probability 29% vs. 24%, p = 0.08), confusion (29% vs. 24%, p = 0.06).

In this model, self-efficacy was no longer significantly associated with indoor tanning behavioral intentions at P >.05, but this result was near significance at P =.08.

Temperature, EPICAT, and time interacted in these data, near significance ( p < 0.08, Table 1 ), with those in TN treated with EPICAT weighing more than those at RT after 16 week ( Table 1 ).

The correlation between the hs-CRP level and postoperative anxiety reached a near significance ( p = 0.081; Figure 3 B).

SR and Emotional Undereating (EU) showed protective trends near significance ( p = 0.081 and p = 0.082, respectively).

The favorable outcome measures for anatomical healing were combined SLAP repair, OHA, male sex (near significance, p = 0.082), and the age under 35 years.

Additionally, time to complete healing tended to be faster for study eyes treated with RGN-259 than those eyes treated with placebo with near significance ( p = 0.0829, Kaplan–Meier analysis).

Gender was near significance in the model (β = -0.248, SE = 35.451, P = 0.083).

Meanwhile, gastric cancer-specific survival also showed a tendency of lower rate in EUT-IGN than in ET-IGN, with relatively near significance ( p = 0.083, Fig. 3 b).

Masks with light contrast produced far less impairment of recognition, with the light mask decline reaching near significance only for participant 10 ( p = 0.083).

For the pair anger–happiness, however, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed only a very marginal near significance difference in the perceptual shifting points between the two directions tested ( Z = –1.736, p = 0.083).

Isolation of Diphtheroid in culture were significantly associated with occurrence of blepharitis ( P = .0027) and near significance was seen in case of SA ( P = .083). 3.5.12 Dacryocystitis Dacryocystitis was seen in 1.8% cases and organisms isolated were SP as single isolate.

HR decreased significantly between Small Talk and Conflict by an estimated 2.45 beats per minute ( SE = 0.93 bpm, p = 0.045), although also the difference manifested for the most part between Small Talk and Teaching near significance (est. decrease of 2.45 bpm ; p = 0.085).

Sphingolipid metabolism was significantly enriched in microbial functional analysis (p = .03) and had near significance in metabolomic pathway enrichment analysis (p = .09) in SG compared to RYGB ( Figure 7 ).

Statistical analysis showed that glycosylation pattern has an effect near significance (p-value =0.09) on ADG1 but not ADG2 (p-value 0.75).

Variables exhibiting significance ( P <0.05) or near significance ( P <0.09) at univariate analysis were included into a Cox proportional hazards models.

The cut-point for Spry2 expression were calculated as described in the Materials and Methods , such that as well as showing high significance for difference in survival (p = 0.0069; Figure 5B ), the cutpoint for Spry2 expression also maintained near significance with Monte Carlo simulations (p = 0.09) and correction for type I error (Miller-Seigmund p value = 0.12).

Classification results showed a very high significance at day five (P < 0.001) and were near significance at day 19 (P = 0.095).

The between group difference of number of persons improved was near significance (p = 0.098) suggesting that the benefit of adding EMG controlled stimulation to a Task-oriented arm rehabilitation might have been proven for persons in the subacute phase after stroke if the planned sample size had been reached.