“narrowly non-significant”

term-born neonates was narrowly non-significant in offsets (p = 0.057) and significant in exponents ( p = 0.036).

Although the correlation was significant in the AD/WT groups combined, only a narrowly non-significant tendency (R=0.913, P = 0.058) was observed in the AD group isolated.

In addition, when looking at the number of 5-FU dose reductions at the patient level, study participants with newly diagnosed het_HapB3 status had a higher, but narrowly non-significant risk of 5-FU dose reductions ( p = 0.06, Table A.16) below the cut-off of 75% of the planned 5-FU dose compared to DPYD -WT carriers.

When evaluating case distributions by AJCC stage, a narrowly non-significant difference was observed among the cohorts ( p = 0.06).

Though the rate was higher in participants with an Anorexia type I diagnosis (22.6%) than those with other ED diagnoses (15.8%): in the expected direction, the difference was narrowly non-significant (chi-squared = 3.5, d.f. = 1, p = .06).

Only the decrease in C: P was statistically significant (edf = 0.76, F = 3.20, P = 0.04), but the decrease in C: N was only narrowly non-significant (edf = 0.69, F = 2.25, P = 0.07).

In contrast to these findings, one study reported that the difference in quality of life index (QLI) score between gMG patients and healthy controls was narrowly non-significant [ 23 ].

Respective risks for mortality and adverse cardiovascular events at the second-highest range in CV+ and CV− patients were narrowly non-significant but increased, while adverse cardiovascular events were significantly increased in the highest CV− haemoglobin category.

The results replicated our main analysis, including the significant difference between FMRI+ and FMRI- patients, but also identified a significant difference (FDR-corrected) between healthy controls and MCS patients ( Supplementary Figure 5 and Supplementary Table 2 ), which had become narrowly non-significant in our main analysis, after accounting for the covariates.

However, it should be noted that the difference between individuals with experience and those without experience was only narrowly non-significant.

Overall, we found that these exposures to ionizing radiation increased the risks of LBW babies, although this association is narrowly non-significant.