Barely Significant
← all phrases

“modest significance”

149 sentences · 149 papers · 181 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.082

Listed by Hankins, posted since

In the literature

modest significancequalifiedgold
Although our analyses identified several AML-related TFs such as PU1, C-Fos, YY1, some of the other AML-related TF regulators such as p300 and C-Myc [48] exhibit either no or rather modest significance (e.g., -statistic 7.58; p-value 0.0059; FDR 0.15 for C-Myc) based on our analysis, which may indicate an over-stringent cutoff (FDR 0.1) used in the feature selection procedure or the intrinsic difference between the mRNA expression and the cognate TF activities.
modest significancequalifiedgold
( 1 ), which includes growth in confirmed cases, country-level control variables and weekly fixed-effects dummy variables, show that growth in confirmed cases variable has a negative and weak significant impact on the Islamic stock market returns (at 10% significance level and 0.010 as highest coefficient) for the initial sample and first sub-sample, while its impact is also negative but with modest significance (at 5% significance level and 0.011 as highest coefficient) for the rest of sub-samples, namely second, third, and fourth.
modest significancequalifiedgold
Notably, our small sample size may lead to modest significance levels, thus large-scale prospective studies are needed to better assess potential associations between clinical characteristics and trends in HbA1c and DEB among adolescents with T1D following the implementation of insulin pump therapy.
modest significancequalifiedgold
In contrast, it showed modest significance in 3-month period (RR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.06–1.75, I 2 = 98%, 5 studies, 4058 studies) ( S7 Fig ), 6-months (RR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.03–1.83, I 2 = 99%, 9 studies, 8303 participants) ( S8 Fig ), 12 months (RR = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.17–1.82, I 2 = 98%, 10 studies, 8438 participants) ( S9 Fig ).
modest significancequalifiedgold
In the presence of salient sociodemographic, clinical, and disease severity covariates, those with an independent relationship style had a 20% increased risk of death compared with those with an interactive relationship style, the model demonstrating modest significance (HR 1.20 [95% CI 1.01–1.43]).