The same trend was also observed for carbonate with Fe (r 2 = 0.88), Mn (r 2 = 0.88), Zn (r 2 = 0.72) and Cu (r 2 = 0.86), and a moderately negative correlation with As (r 2 = −0.55; p < 0.05) in the core of Chaube Chhapra but it showed a positive correlation with Zn (r 2 = 0.75) and a moderately significant with Mn (r 2 = 0.44; p < 0.05) only.
← all phrases
“moderately significant”
Sighted at
P<0.11p>0.11
In the literature
Overall, NSE and NSH had highly significant differences in the standard deviations for DA and MP (p<0.001) and moderately significant difference for DF (p<0.05)s.
The administration of diazepam and the APS extract at 400 mg/kg in our investigation entailed a moderately significant ( p < 0.05) quantity of head‐dipping and a delay in the initial head‐dipping compared to the control.
We then introduced the moderately significant variables ( p < 0.05) in univariate analyses into multivariate analyses (stepwise forward).
Comparison of the mean expression levels between T1D and MA groups revealed highly significant differences for six proteins (sTNFR1, sTNFR2, sIL2Rα, MMP2, sIL6R, and sgp130; P < 1 × 10 −5 ) and moderately significant differences for four proteins (CRP, SAA, sICAM1, and sVCAM1; P < 0.05) (Table S1 in Supplementary Material).
Thus, we obtained moderately significant effect sizes in reduced sense of accomplishment ( d = −0.74, SE = 0.31, p < 0.05).
The results were interpreted at the level of P < 0.001 as highly significant, P < 0.01 as moderately significant, P < 0.05 as significant and P > 0.05 as insignificant.
Significant figures +Suggestive significance ( P value: 0.05 < P < 0.10) *Moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) **Strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01).
In the first phase of the study, the traditional teaching model used by Group A had a moderately significant effect ( p < 0.05) on improving participants’ positive psychological qualities only in the “Cognition” dimension, with no significant effects observed in the other dimensions.
Post hoc comparisons revealed that the microdosing group had a moderately significant improvement in CMJ (g = 0.66, p < 0.05), a very significant improvement in RSI (g = 0.96, p < 0.01), and a moderately significant benefit in RSImod (g = 0.71, p < 0.05) compared to the control group.
The CCHVI method does not include a composite score and among their variables, the correlation is moderately significant and negative for the excess emergency room visit rate and tree canopy coverage (r s = −0.31 , p < 0.05 ), projected number of extreme heat days (r s = −0.3 , p < 0.01 ), and percent population without health insurance (r s = −0.28 , p < 0.05 ) as is also reflected in Factor 5 of SoVI ® (r s = −0.38 , p < 0.01 ) ( Table 1 ).
The results were intimated as moderately significant ( P < 0.05 and ∗∗ P < 0.01) and as highly significant ( ∗∗∗ P < 0.001). 3.
14 In the present study, we found a moderately significant negative correlation between E/e’ and e’ ( P < 0.05).
There was a moderately significant difference in spatial extent estimates by study type (p = 0.05), with a median spatial extent of 300 m in monitoring studies, versus 125 m in epidemiological studies and 400 m in dispersion modeling studies.
Among the isoforms, p53E exhibited the strongest induction ( P < 0.001), whereas all the other isoforms showed a moderately significant increase ( P < 0.05).
Local efficiency AUC averaged across hub nodes showed a moderately significant correlation with duration of epilepsy in the contralateral hemisphere (r(15) = −0.496, p < 0.05; [ Fig. 4 ]), indicating that hub node efficiency may be reduced in the contralateral hemisphere in patients with a longer duration of epilepsy.
MAF (months above freezing temperature) producing moderately significant slope/intercept differences (Δ slope = 0.006 ± 0.003°C −1 , Δ intercept = −0.17 ± 0.06, p <.05), and regression vs MAT producing highly significant differences (Δ slope = 0.011 ± 0.003°C −1 , Δintercept = −0.29 ± 0.06, p < .001) from the culture data (Table 1c ).
RALS also showed a moderately significant inverse correlation with mPAP in patients undergoing catheterization within six months (r = 0.51, P < 0.05) ( Fig. 1 ).
The degree of significant associations between the variables were presented as P < 0.001*** (highly significant), P < 0.01** (moderately significant) and P < 0.05* (significant).
However, the HPCL samples exhibited significantly decreased levels of IL-17A (p < 0.05), IL-22 (p < 0.001), IL-23 (p < 0.01), and TGF-β (p < 0.05) with no significant change in IL-1β and a moderately significant increase in IL-6 levels (p < 0.05) compared with BVL patient group.
Second, there are genes (seen in green) that show a moderately significant change in expression ( p -value < 0.05) and an absolute value of log 2 FoldChange > 2.
The results showed that the main effects of conditions were moderately significant (close to being significant difference, p < 0.0508); Fig. 5 and Tables 13 , 14 , and 15 ).
A permutation test confirmed the associations for rs1805007 and rs258322 as moderately significant (empirical P=0.051 and P=0.065, respectively).
No statistically significant association was found between pharmacological treatment and response to therapy (χ 2 = 4.464, 4 df, p = 0.347), while a moderately significant association was found between therapy and recurrence of symptomatology (χ 2 = 5.969, 2 df, p = 0.051).
baumannii ( P < 0.001) and moderately significant decrease in S. aureus ( P < 0.051) but growth of P. aeruginosa was not affected except for platelet gel supernatant activated by PEF.