“moderately significant”

Suggestive significance was when P value was <.05 < P <.10; moderately significant when P value was <.01 < P ≤ .05; and strongly significant when P value was P ≤ .01.

Conversely, the direct effect of age on health was moderately significant (coeff = 0.040, p <0.05).

There was a moderately significant decrease of 15.5% ( P < 0.05, Cohen's d = 2.33).

For Experiments 2 (T24) and 3 (T23) the highly significant results gave evidence of a common phasing among animals (p < 0.002; Scheme 3, S3 ), while the Tidal T-cycle Experiments 5 (T t = 12.25) and 6 (T t = 12.65) each gave moderately significant evidence of common phasing (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01; Scheme 3, S3 ).

There were moderately significant correlations ( p < 0.05) observed between damp damage, damp housing, visible mold and mildew.

Fisher’s exact test is used when cell samples are very small (0.05 < P < 0.10 was taken as + Suggestive significance, 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05* Moderately significant 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05, and P ≤ 0.01 as **Strongly significant).

Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA revealed that compaction pressure had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) on EIIE , while MC and particle size showed moderately significant effects ( p < 0.05).

They carried out the Pearson correlation analysis to clarify the relationship between total PAHs, MPs, and PM 2.5 (PM with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less), and the results revealed that there was a moderately significant relationship between PAHs and PM 2.5 ( r = 0.45, p < 0.05).

Comparison of the mean expression levels between T1D and MA groups revealed highly significant differences for six proteins (sTNFR1, sTNFR2, sIL2Rα, MMP2, sIL6R, and sgp130; P < 1 × 10 −5 ) and moderately significant differences for four proteins (CRP, SAA, sICAM1, and sVCAM1; P < 0.05) (Table S1 in Supplementary Material).

The mice in the high- and middle-dose curculigoside groups, as well as in the soy isoflavones group, show significantly enhanced standing times (P < .01), and the mice in Gengnian'an group show moderately significant enhancement in standing times (P < .05). 3.2 Effect on latency and number of electric shocks for mice modeling perimenopausal depression in passive avoidance The passive avoidance test results are shown in Table 2 .

A negative and moderately significant correlation was observed between CMJ and agility (p<0.05), but the correlation between DJ and agility was not significant (p>0.05).

Single) and dose prescription values were also moderately significant ( p < 0.05) in the Bowel model.

In contrast to that, the platelet levels were low in group Ic mice and slightly increased in group Ia mice, which were moderately significant ( P < 0.05), upon treatment with 6,7-dimethoxycoumarin.

Correlation analysis of the data from pregnant women with FGR found only a moderately significant correlation between age and FGR ( p <0.05) ( Table 5 ).

Multiple regression analysis of the values for SA and HNO postoperatively and at EG showed a statistically highly significant difference between Group A and Group B (P < 0.001) and a moderately significant dependence of the correction on age (P < 0.05), while sex showed no influence (P > 0.05).

After moderately significant genes ( p < 0.05) were removed, the overall effect of rare nonsynonymous allele load remained significant.

According to p -values obtained by ANOVA analysis, linear terms of ethanol concentration and liquid–solid ratio exhibited a highly significant effect ( p < 0.01) on Y and TP, while the linear term of extraction time had a moderately significant effect (0.01 < p < 0.05) only on Y.

Depressive disorder [ARR 1.7 (1.2, 2.3)], and drug dependence [ARR 1.6 (1.1, 2.2)] had a moderately significant ( p < 0.05) association with LOS in comparison to the absence of these disorders.

Pearson correlation between study variables is performed to find the degree of relationship, Pearson correlation coefficient ranging between −1 and 1, −1 being the perfect negative correlation, 0 is the no correlation, and 1 means perfect positive correlation Significant figures + - Suggestive significance ( P : 0.05 < P < 0.10) * - Moderately significant ( P : 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05) ** - Strongly significant ( P : P ≤ 0.01).[ 17 18 19 20 ] R ESULTS Of the 100 patients in our study, in our selected time frame, 51% were male and 49% were female.

The only difference was observed for the significance levels—the NC study found the difference to be highly significant ( p = 0.0004) while our study found a moderately significant difference at p ≤ 0.05 level.

When comparing the exact measurement points of 2 consecutive days, a moderately significant correlation was found ( r between 0.325 and 0.745; p < 0.05).

The studies were numbered 1? 2? 3, 4a and 4b, each containing one or Repriiits fi-on-i the 'NIJIC Lettkaemia 17iilt, Royal Postgraduate Atedical Sebool, London, W12 MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL two dozen patients, and when Studies 2, 3 and 4a, all of which involved a similar form of immunotherapy, were pooled, the apparent effects of immunotherapy on duration of first remission and on survival were moderately significant statistically (P<0.05).

Our results revealed that three genes ( MTHFD2, PPP1R15A , and WNT5B ) exhibited significant differences in expression ( p < 0.001), whereas SLC2A4 demonstrated a moderately significant difference ( p < 0.05, Figure 7A ).

During the Pearson correlation, highly significant and moderately significant were defined as P < 0.05 and 0.10, respectively. 3.

“Communication” had positive and moderately significant ( p < 0.05) association; “culture” had positive and significant ( p < 0.1) association while “rumor” associated moderate significantly ( p < 0.05) and negatively with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.