“moderately significant”

Based on p-value criteria, the correlation coefficient’s statistical significance is evaluated as follows: not significant at p > 0.10, moderately significant at p < 0.05, and highly significant at p < 0.01.

Responsiveness The correlations of BBS scores and Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were moderately significant (ρ = 0.57, p < 0.05 and ρ = 0.42, p < 0.05, respectively) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.

+ Suggestive significance 0.05< P < 0.10 * Moderately significant 0.01< P ≤ 0.05 ** Strongly significant P ≤0.01 Statistical software: The Statistical software namely SPSS 15.0, Medcalc 9.0.1, Stata 8.0 and Systat 8.0 were used for the analysis of the data and Microsoft word and Excel have been used to generate graphs, tables etc.

∗∗∗A highly significant, ∗∗moderately significant, and ∗∗slightly significant difference (P < 0.05) linked to the regulator was considered as examined by one-way ANOVA.

Whereas up to a concentration of 80 μg/mL, the hatching rate was moderately significant (p < 0.05).

Only mouth width showed a moderately significant positive correlation with the amount of jackscrew activation ( p < 0.05). 4.2.

There was also a moderately significant difference ( p = 0.05) in tetraantennary glycans—higher in women with PCOS compared to healthy controls ( Figure 1 M,N). 2.4.

1 b and 3 ) (moderately significant at p value = 0.05).

For women with an unknown educational level, we also observed a moderately significant higher use of non-hormonal LARCs as opposed to oral short-acting hormonal contraceptives (rrr = 2.62; p < 0.050) compared to women with primary or secondary education.

Data were analyzed and presented as mean± S.E.M and considered p -values ≤ 0.0001 of extremely high significance (indicated by ****); p -values ≤ 0.001, high significance (indicated by ***); p -values ≤ 0.01, moderately significant (indicated by **); and p -values ≤ 0.05, low significance (indicated by *); and p -values > 0.05, non-significant (n.s). 3.

Specifically, the lower expression of MYBL2 was associated with a favorable overall survival in LGG 15 , LIHC 16 and NSCLC 17 , high DKK1 was identified for gastric cancer 18 , and NPTX2, which was moderately significant (p ≤ 0.05) for the survival 20 , has been suggested to have prognostic value for GBM 19 .

Results indicate that the pattern of resistance is highly significant (P < 0.01) for cefotaxime, amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin and pefloracin, while it was moderately significant (P < 0.05) for chloramphenicol.

However, we also consider p values between 0.01 and 0.005 as moderately significant, and we refer to 0.01<p < 0.05 as indicating a trend.

“Rumor” had moderately significant ( p <.05) and negative association while “gender” had insignificant correlation with vaccine acceptance intention.

melongena , parameters such as P, WHC, EC, CEC and pH were observed to have strong statistical differences ( p < 0.01), while Zn and Fe were found to be moderately significant with values having p ≤ 0.05 (Fig. 1b ).

According to the Pearson correlation analysis a positive, moderately significant relationship between the EDE-Q total scores and anxiety scores was observed (r=.630, p<.05).

The difference was considered as significant with P values of <0.1 to 0.05, moderately significant with P values of <0.05 to 0.01 and strongly significant with P value of <0.01. 7 – 10 Statistical software The statistical software, SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and R environment (version 2.11.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), were used for the analysis of the data.

P ≤ 0.001 considered as highly significant, P ≤ 0.01 considered as moderately significant, P ≤ 0.05 considered as significant with respect to disease control group.

Tukey’s HSD test revealed weak or moderately significant differences in the average DNA yield from stamps between the controls (E4) and the samples subjected to fingerprint development (E1 to E3) ( p ≤ 0.05; 95% CI = −0.001 and 0.099).

There were moderately significant correlations ( p < 0.05) observed between damp damage, damp housing, visible mold and mildew.

Conversely, the direct effect of age on health was moderately significant (coeff = 0.040, p <0.05).

Statistical significance was defined as follows: * moderately significant ( P value: 0.01 < P ≤ 0.05); ** strongly significant ( P value: P ≤ 0.01).

Significant figures + suggestive significance (0.05< P < 0.10), *moderately significant (0.01< P ≤ 0.05), **strongly significant ( P ≤ 0.01).

The correlation analysis between GC12 and GC3 showed that there was a highly significant correlation ( p < .01) between GC12 and CG3 of ATP6 , COX1 , CYTB , ND2 , ND5 , and ND6 genes, as well as a moderately significant correlation for ATP8 ( p < .05), indicating that the mutation pattern of bases in codon positions one and two was identical to that of position three and that mutational pressure played a significant role in the CUB of these seven genes.

Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA revealed that compaction pressure had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) on EIIE , while MC and particle size showed moderately significant effects ( p < 0.05).