“marginally statistically significant”

In Figure 3 , the Fine and Gray model also shows similar results, except for prostate cancer becoming marginally statistically significant (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.99, 2.63). 4.

Patients undergoing radiation (OR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.36–2.79) and surgery (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 0.99–3.14) were more likely to be recommended or prescribed ET, although surgery was only marginally statistically significant.

As for the NDM group, weight loss was also statistically significant for community-recruited participants but only marginally statistically significant for physician-referred participants.

Prenatal exposure had marginally statistically significant association (OR=1.11; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.23) with asthma in children.

Associations with 0.05 p < 0.1 were reported as marginally statistically significant. 3.

Differences in cognitive scores between PLWH and older HIV‐negative controls appeared at least marginally statistically significant; however, the size of the association with HIV infection itself (effect sizes of −0.14 and −0.17 for older and younger PLWH, respectively) appeared to be moderate, broadly equating to the association seen between mild/moderate depression and the global Z ‐score (effect sizes of −0.08 and −0.17, respectively).

The interaction between emotional abuse and vmHRV in predicting depressive symptoms ( b = 2.42, SE = 1.30, t = 1.85, p = .066) was marginally statistically significant.

However, regarding this particular comparison, in the meta-analysis by Wang et al., the difference was only marginally statistically significant [ 70 ].

Similarly, few statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were observed between countries when taking Austria as the reference with only Denmark ( p = 0.029) and Italy ( p = 0.024) being marginally statistically significant in some comparisons ( Table S6 ). 4.

Risk of HER2–breast cancer decreased with increasing number of MET-hours of recreational physical activity in each specific life period examined, although some trend tests were only marginally statistically significant (all P trend ≤ 0.06).

But, it must be cautioned that this effect is only marginally statistically significant in the OLS specification and not significant in the weighted least squares specification.

** When results are analyzed separately by the language pairs in which participants were addressed, we find that effects are similar in magnitude and are marginally statistically significant for the following pairs: Dutch and Spanish (N = 154), German and Spanish (N = 104), and Mandarin and English (N = 108) and similar but nonsignificant for the following pairs: Dutch and English (N = 192), Dutch and French (N = 188), German and English (N = 206), German and French (N = 140), and Mandarin and French (N = 48). †† We additionally tested whether results were predicted by the actual time of the day for the participant by including the time stamps in the main regression models (adjusted to participant’s location).

After further adjusting age, sex, PS score, and clinical stage in the logistic regression model, it can also be found that the association between average vessel length and treatment unresponsiveness (SD + PD) remained marginally statistically significant, suggesting that the enhanced pro‐angiogenic capacity of CD33 + MDSCs may represent a risk factor for treatment unresponsiveness in SCLC (Table 3 ). 3.4.

Discussion This meta-analysis on the clinical outcomes of systematic electrocardiogram-based AF screening in individuals without known AF has three key findings: 1) AF screening is associated with a marginally statistically significant 7% relative reduction in the incidence of stroke and systemic embolism, 2) there is no signal of an increase harm in terms of major bleeding events, and 3) screening has no effect on all-cause mortality.

Results Fully adjusted models indicate a marginally statistically significant 0.16 percentage point reduction [CI −0.35 to 0.02] in the probability of self-rated cognitive function decline for a 10 % increase in the smoke-free bar coverage.

They found a marginally statistically significant association between farmers who were fertilizer applicants in the highest intensity county strata compared with non-farmers who lived in the counties with the lowest intensity (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9).

From typical phonation to soft phonation, most participants adjusted along both the PC2 (reduced vocal fold adduction) and PC1 (increased cricothyroid muscle activation), with changes in PC1 and PC2 both significantly differently from zero (except for female participants in which changes in PC1 were marginally statistically significant).

This increase was marginally statistically significant when all groups were compared but reached statistical significance when compared only with WT mice (Fig. 1 H).

PZQ therapy had a marginally statistically significant effect on reducing the prevalence of underweight.

When the effect of an anti-TNFα drug is assessed in patients who have received no previous MTX treatment, the relative ACR20 effect is small and only marginally statistically significant: 1.10 (0.96–1.26).

Thus, the DMFS survival curves of the two groups showed the same trend as in OS, whereas the p -value was 0.052, which was marginally statistically significant, possibly due to the small sample size.

Furthermore, an overall marginally statistically significant association was observed between the smoking status and the reason of tooth loss.

For example, there was a marginally statistically significant difference in the scores of average effectiveness of storytime/reading books by type of respondent, and educators scored this activity as more effective than families.

In contrast, the differences observed in food purchases driven by security needs are only marginally statistically significant.

Thas was also the case when considering responses of the bacterial species that were marginally statistically significant ( Table 1 ).