Conclusions In conclusion, the findings of this study identified a marginally statistically significant positive correlation between circulating 25(OH)D 3 levels and mtDNA-CN in peripheral blood cells within the elderly population.
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
A recent glioma international case–control study and a meta-analysis published in 2020 using patients data from Glioma International Case-Control Study (GICC) which included 4,533 glioma cases and 4,171 controls during 2010–2013 supported a roughly 40% hazard reduction rate by daily use of aspirin and a 16% marginally statistically significant prevention effects of aspirin against GBM by the meta-analysis [ 104 ].
By contrast, the association with livestock contact in the first year of life was specifically restricted to children who were reported to have had contact with pets in the first year of life (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81; not tabulated), although the interaction was marginally statistically significant ( P int = 0.09; Table 5 ).
Summary of the evidence Previous studies showed an increase of the likelihood of treatment success when cycloserine was included in the MDR-TB regimen (marginally statistically significant) ( 96 ).
There was a negative but only marginally statistically significant relationship between the number of isolates that matched human cases and emergent wetlands.
These results should be interpreted as marginally statistically significant, which means that more studies are needed to fully assess the statistical significance of the measured effect.
The discrepancy between the stronger precipitation-flux relationship in the bottom-up emissions used as priors and the moderate, marginally statistically significant relationship in the posterior fluxes could be due to differences in estimated IAV.
As the results showed only marginally statistically significant interactions between dose and gender, and for each factor individually, the analysis was deemed inconclusive.
After adjustment, those from northern Europe were less likely to have a high offer rate than those in Southern Europe (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.032–1.09, p = 0.062), although this was marginally statistically significant, possibly due to the small sample size.
Column 1 further reports results regarding the association between education and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: Relative to the baseline of women with primary or less than primary education, women with any secondary education were 2.4 pp more likely to be vaccinated; however, the coefficient was only marginally statistically significant.
Though marginally statistically significant (at alpha <0.1), when categorized by gender, homeless women had longer wait times than female domiciled patients.
Reporting good social community and influence at work were associated with a reduced likelihood of “some days—increasing” sick leave due to pain, although the effects were small and marginally statistically significant.
Apart from the increase in the ‘all deaths’ rate ratio (RR) of 1.46, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.07 in the penultimate cumulative exposure category, which was marginally statistically significant, none of the relative risks were significantly greater than unity.
When leg muscle strength, SPBB score, thigh muscle CSA, and thigh muscle muscle HU value were entered simultaneously in the proportional hazards model (model 2), only thigh muscle HU value was significantly associated with incident hip fracture (RR/SD = 1.41; 95% CI 1.01–1.93), an association that remained marginally statistically significant after adjustment for total femur BMD.
Although only marginally statistically significant, our evidence suggests a trend that groups with larger genomes can be associated with higher levels of hybridization propensity, contrary to this previous work.
Lower age of onset (0.96 [0.93–1.00], p = 0.075) and tremor (2.50 [0.94–7.43], p = 0.078) were marginally statistically significant but felt relevant to include in the model.
While the estimated associations between short‐term exposures to PM 2.5 and morbidity were generally slightly higher (and marginally statistically significant) for men compared to women, heterogeneity analyses found no statistically significant difference in respiratory (RRR = 1.00, I 2 = 33%) or cardiovascular morbidity risk (RRR = 1.00, I 2 = 0%) by sex (Table 2 ).
We found that pet owners were more likely to be current alcohol users than non-owners, tended to score higher on a standard assessment of harmful or hazardous alcohol use, and this association remained marginally statistically significant when adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic covariates in the model.
We observed no overall inverse associations for total coffee, and caffeinated coffee and a marginally statistically significant inverse association between decaffeinated coffee and endometrial cancer risk.
al 8 study, whereas it is marginally statistically significant in this cohort.
The results in the non-MCI group indicated that the center of gravity shift while throwing toward the target was a potential protective factor, and this finding was marginally statistically significant.
Risk of coronary heart disease was also lower in this group (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22–1.09), but was only marginally statistically significant.
For CO, we found marginally statistically significant associations for total personal exposure (1.05 (1.01,1.10)), driven by indoor sources (1.06 (1.01, 1.12)).
The relationship between serum total IgE ( p -value; 0.041), ECP ( p -value; 0.04) and serum IL-31 level was the only marginally statistically significant association.
The tendency, after case-mix adjustment, towards a slightly shorter waiting time in the most prosperous group may be due to preferential treatment of this group, but the difference is not large (52 vs 50–51% treated within 60 days) and only marginally statistically significant, despite the very large number of cases.