Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally statistically significant”

1,111 sentences · 1,111 papers · 1,322 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

A recent glioma international case–control study and a meta-analysis published in 2020 using patients data from Glioma International Case-Control Study (GICC) which included 4,533 glioma cases and 4,171 controls during 2010–2013 supported a roughly 40% hazard reduction rate by daily use of aspirin and a 16% marginally statistically significant prevention effects of aspirin against GBM by the meta-analysis [ 104 ].
By contrast, the association with livestock contact in the first year of life was specifically restricted to children who were reported to have had contact with pets in the first year of life (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.81; not tabulated), although the interaction was marginally statistically significant ( P int = 0.09; Table 5 ).
Column 1 further reports results regarding the association between education and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: Relative to the baseline of women with primary or less than primary education, women with any secondary education were 2.4 pp more likely to be vaccinated; however, the coefficient was only marginally statistically significant.
When leg muscle strength, SPBB score, thigh muscle CSA, and thigh muscle muscle HU value were entered simultaneously in the proportional hazards model (model 2), only thigh muscle HU value was significantly associated with incident hip fracture (RR/SD = 1.41; 95% CI 1.01–1.93), an association that remained marginally statistically significant after adjustment for total femur BMD.
While the estimated associations between short‐term exposures to PM 2.5 and morbidity were generally slightly higher (and marginally statistically significant) for men compared to women, heterogeneity analyses found no statistically significant difference in respiratory (RRR = 1.00, I 2 = 33%) or cardiovascular morbidity risk (RRR = 1.00, I 2 = 0%) by sex (Table 2 ).
We found that pet owners were more likely to be current alcohol users than non-owners, tended to score higher on a standard assessment of harmful or hazardous alcohol use, and this association remained marginally statistically significant when adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic covariates in the model.