“marginally significant”

Affective state The Friedman test revealed a significant effect of experimental phase on valence (X 2 (1) = 4.80, p < .05) and a marginally significant effect on arousal (X 2 (1) = 3.79, p = .05).

The number of brood had a marginally significant effect (GLMM: brood F 1,177 = 5.237; P ≤ 0.05), while population and colony phase (i.e., the presence or absence of adult offspring) had no significant effect (population F 1,175 = 0.093; P = 0.761; colony phase F 1,176 = 0.157; P = 0.692).

On one hand, for intra-subject, statistical test on the performance of deep ConvNet over shallow ConvNet find the statistics Z = −1.923 which is marginally significant ( p = 0.05), where the negative Z shows the shallow ConvNet performs better than deep ConvNet.

In addition, the three‐way interaction between general levels of identification, type of action, and the dummy variable reflecting the comparison between T1 and T2 was marginally significant, b = −0.36, 95% CI [−0.73, 0.00], SE = 0.19, t = −1.95, p = .050 (see Figure 3 ).

A marginally significant association was observed between the SLA and LT plasticity indices (r = 0.317, p = 0.05). 3.

It was observed that a higher percentage of respondents in the US+ group (55.77%) chose to forfeit their ability to smell in comparison to those in the US− group (39.86%) for hair, although this difference was marginally significant (χ 2 (N = 200) = 3.95, p = 0.05).

Similar to other studies, females were more strongly affected than males [ 10 ], a result that was marginally significant ( P-value = 0.05).

Competence was significantly associated with use intention (β=.46, P <.001), and relatedness also showed a marginally significant association (β=.15, P =.05).

Results Neither MMP-2 SNPs nor MMP-9 SNPs revealed significant association with PDR in single-locus comparisons; similarly, MMP-2 haplotype frequencies did not differ notably between groups, although the C-allele of the −1306C/T polymorphism and the C-allele containing haplotype (CGCG) in MMP-2 exhibited marginally significant association with PDR in males (p<0.05, p corr =NS).

There was a marginally significant negative correlation between changes (baseline to 12 months) in average steps/day and the change BMI ( r = −0.389; P = 0.050), where steps/day increased as BMI decreased over time.

This gives a total of 290 cancers to 336 operations for benign lesions - a malignant to benign operation ratio of 1:1.2. Prognostic factors of cancers detected There is no significant difference between the study and historical control groups in the numbers of in situ carcinomas - 4% in the study group and 3% in the historical control, but there is a marginally significant difference (P<0.05) in the rate of advanced disease - 18% and 13% respectively.

The mean K occ;30–60 values in the DD group were significantly greater in the caudate (ES = 0.83, corrected p = 0.048), but marginally significant in the putamen (ES—Cohen’s d coefficient = 1.07, corrected p = 0.05) relative to the control group.

Significance was taken as P <0.05, but marginally significant values of P = 0.05-0.10 are also mentioned.

A marginally significant negative correlation was also observed between HIL and pterygium thickness ( r = −0.178, P = 0.050) in this cohort (Table 5 ).

Equality constraints were then imposed upon the autoregressive parameters, which did lead to a marginally significant decrement in model fit, χ 2 change = 9.59, df = 4, p = 0.05.

The AUC comparison for anxiety was marginally significant (Z = 1.93, p = 0.05), indicating that the Loneliness Scale was slightly more accurate in classifying this disorder.

Spikers with a very regular spiking frequency can also have marginally significant principal peaks, but normally with p > 0.05.

However, a marginally significant main effect of feature, F (2,57) = 3.15, p = 0.05, ƞ p 2 = 0.10, and an interaction of feature and instruction was found, F (2,57) = 8.72, p < 0.001, ƞ p 2 = 0.23.

Further, the differences in CSF p -tau levels between two clusters were marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Table 1 and Figure 2B ).

For standard deviation, a marginally significant main effect of Group was found ( F 2,53 = 3.29, P = 0.05, = 0.11).

Differences between the materials were statistically marginally significant ( P = 0.05).

38), pre-SLS test-dominant (26.8% decrease in falls for 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-dominant, p = 0.003), pre-SLS test-non-dominant (15.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-non-dominant, p = 0.029), MMSE (10.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in MMSE, p = 0.018), and marginally significant for pre-FRT (4.6% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-FRT, p = 0.050).

38.0±9.1 minutes), and this difference was marginally significant (P=0.05).

In contrast, children with high compliance demonstrated greater autonomy and independence from their families than those with low (marginally significant) and delayed low compliance ( p < 0.05).

It remained marginally significant when controlling for province (β = 0.003, p = 0.05), but province itself was not significantly associated with total wait time (partial F test = 0.88, p = 0.56).