“marginally significant”

Moreover, marginally significant lower ATF4 mRNA levels were also observed in the Empa group ( p = 0.05) ( Figure 4 ).

In this analysis of advanced echocardiographic variables, only GWE exhibited a marginally significant difference between the two groups of heart transplant recipients ( p = 0.05), being higher in the OHT < 4 group compared to those with OHT ≥ 4.

The renin angiotensin system inhibitors therapy resulted in a marginally significant reduction in liver fibrosis score (MD = -0.30; 95% CI: -0.62–0.02, p = 0.05) and a significant reduction in liver fibrosis area (MD = -2.36%; 95% CI: -4.22%–-0.50%, p = 0.01) as compared with control.

Compared to the extended team period (0.64), there was a marginally significant reduction in cardiac arrest of nonmedical ward patients ( P = .05).

Emotional support still showed a marginally significant association with gratitude (OR = 2.47, p = 0.05).

The regression model contained 4 item factors (CC-Acc1, P <.001; CD-Acc3, P <.001; DR-Acc1, P =.03; and DR-RT1, P =.02) as the significant predictor at P <.05; 5 item factors were marginally significant predictors at P =.05-.07 ( Table 3 ).

Interestingly, there was a marginally significant difference on the measure of environmental health t (76) = −2.041, p = .05.

S6 Dataset A list of 497 genes that showed marginally significant difference in viral induced gene expression changes between asthmatic between non-asthmatic ALI samples (nominal p <0.05).

The ANOVA results showed (see Table 4 ) that the main effect of exercise level was significant, F (1, 99) = 30.16, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.23; the main effect of gender was marginally significant, F (1, 99) = 3.34, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.03; the interaction between exercise level and gender was not significant, F (1, 99) = 0.12, p > 0.05, η 2 = 0.02.

In multivariate analysis including variables with P<0.10 (cortisol and gender), high cortisol showed a marginally significant association with shorter PFS (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.00–2.69, P = 0.050), and female gender remained an independent risk factor (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.01–2.49, P = 0.044; Table 4 ).

A significant difference was observed between CN and MCI groups using both methods, but only the screener‐derived score remained marginally significant after adjustments ( p = 0.05) (Figure 3).

The interaction between tobacco consumption and GDM was non-significant ( p = 0.60) but the interaction between age and GDM was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

ANOVA again did not find a significant main effect of test time ( F 3,125 = 0.126, p = 0.945) but did reveal a marginally significant effect of photoperiod ( F 1,125 = 3.916, p = 0.050), without a significant interaction ( F 3,125 = 1.634, p = 0.185) (Fig. 2 c).

The movement × condition interaction was not significant for control pictures ( F (1, 58) = .72, p = .40), but it was marginally significant for alcohol pictures ( F (1,58) = 3.92 p = .05).

Results: The unadjusted difference between ASD and TD groups in terms of geometric mean blood Pb concentrations was marginally significant ( p = 0.05), but for Al concentrations, the adjusted difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

There was a marginally significant genotype-by-diagnosis interaction (F 2,110 = 3.08, p = 0.050), which appeared to be driven by CUD patients with homozygous CC, who had shorter latencies on unsuccessful Stop trials compared with healthy control participans of the same genotype (F 1,103 = 3.703, p = 0.057).

For subjects with carotid calcified plaque, northern subjects had marginally significant larger volume of calcification (19.9 mm 3 vs 8.0 mm 3 , p=0.050) than southern subjects.

The results showed that friendship quality did not play a significant role in predicting loneliness for typically developing students, students with ASD and students with motor and/or sensory disabilities, although there was a marginally significant effect of friendship quality on loneliness (−0.21, p < 0.05) for the entire group of students with SEN (special education needs).

There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between food and the number of rivals (X 2 = 3.96, p = 0.05).

Again, no other predictor reached conventional levels of significance although warmth was a marginally significant negative predictor, B = −0.62, SE = 0.32, Exp(B) = 0.54, p = 0.05.

34 While the association of HR-HPV infection and anal HSIL was marginally significant for both men and women living with HIV in our study (p > 0.05), others have reported a significant association between these variables, but when the HPV genotype has been considered, the fraction of anal cancer attributable to HPV-16 is smaller in the HPV-positive population. 35 Moreover, anal wart

However, baseline right hemisphere BA25 metabolism showed a marginally significant correlation with change from baseline MADRS, whereby higher baseline metabolism predicted better response to O/F therapy ( r = 0.68, P = .05).

While we did not observe significant interactions with genotype group within the latter latency window (Congruency×Genotype: p>.05, Congruency×Genotype×Site: p>.05), we did observe a (marginally significant) Congruency×Genotype interaction in the earlier (600 and 800 ms) time window (F(1,47) = 4.03, MSe = 46.38, p = .05; Congruency×Genotype×Site: p>.05).

Low educational attainment was marginally significant ( P = .05) in indicating approximately 1.7 additional unhealthy days, and a medium level of community poverty was independently significant in indicating approximately 1.4 additional unhealthy days in comparison to those living in a more affluent community.

Other notable findings include significantly less simultaneous nephrectomies in the late group (22.4% versus 89.4%, P < 0.001) and a marginally significant higher proportion of posttransplant nephrectomies (25.4% versus 12.1%, P = 0.050).