“marginally significant”

Correlational analyses revealed a marginally significant positive correlation of the congruency effect found in fEMG with the behavioral CSE of RT, r (22) = .41, p = .048 (see Figure 2 ), but no such correlation for the ER measure, p ≥ .52. 3.3 Discussion Experiment 2 replicated a conflict‐induced increase in corrugator activation using a task in which SR congruency levels did not involve the systematic repetitions and/or changes of stimulus/response features.

While there were no group differences in ACC with respect to mR of corporal objects (F(1, 44) = 1.91, p = 0.174), HC achieved higher accuracies than CD that were marginally significant (F(1, 44) = 4.134, p = 0.048).

No significant differentiation was found in EORTC QLQ-BR45 domains except for a marginally significant p -value for body image ( p = 0.048). 4.

Survival analysis showed that level IV/V neck lymph node involvement was a marginally significant risk factor for DSS ( P = 0.048) and a significant adverse prognostic factor for DFS ( P = 0.018) ( Fig 2 ).

Peak Oxygen Uptake Between the HIIT Protocols and Maximal Oxygen Consumption Obtained From GXT Although the ANOVA indicated a marginally significant difference among conditions ( F (1.6,14.5) = 4.03; p = 0.048; η 2 p = 0.31), the pairwise post hoc comparisons did not reveal any statistically significant differences ( p = 0.123–0.566; Cohen's d = 0.50–0.88). 3.2.

However, the analysis showed a marginally significant relation between brood size and body weight of the 4th instar hosts ( χ 2 = 3.65, P = 0.048), with a gradual increase by ca 20% in brood size with each increase of 0.1 mg in host body weight; brood size ranged from 4 to 14 wasps with an average of 9.3 ± 0.3 (±SE) across host body weight from 0.18 to 0.69 mg ( Fig. 1C ).

IM-1 (80%) was not significantly different from Med-PaLM 2 (80% vs 92%, difference=12 percentage points, P =.16), LLaVA-Med (80% vs 76%; P =.50), BioGPT (80% vs 68%; P =.22), or ChatGPT 5.0 (80% vs 64%; P =.048—marginally significant).

In a sensitivity analysis, analysis of the change scores did find this effect to be marginally significant ( p = 0.048).

The faunally intact site, TRC, there was marginally significant kinship between seedlings in the first distance class (7 m; one‐sided test: obs>exp., p = 0.048; two‐sided test: obs < > exp., p = 0.09) but no other intervals differed significantly from null expectations.

Shannon diversity was greater in older animals than younger ones in the colon ( p < 0.0001), and marginally significant in the jejunum in samples that could be analyzed ( p = 0.048), but this did not change significantly over time in the cecum nor stomach ( Figure 2A ).

First, we found marginally significant main effects of intervention under both sufficient ( F (2, 114) = 3.12, p = .048, partial η 2 = 0.052) and insufficient ( F (2, 122) = 2.66, p = .07, partial η 2 = 0.042) pension manipulations.

The most important factors for deciding to use biosimilars by specialty were: for hematologists, comparative clinical trials (86%; p = 0.002); for rheumatologists, comparative immunogenicity data (59%; p = 0.027); and for oncologists, cost of treatment (46%; p = 0.048; marginally significant). 3.5.

Concerning FFM, just old rats in the ST25 group had a larger – tough marginally significant – percent increase from baseline compared with the old ST12 group (diet effect, same age, p = 0.048), and also tended to have a greater increase of FFM than adult ST25 rats (age effect, same diet, p = 0.061), see Figure 1E .

Results Experiment 1 Recall performance on trivia questions A 2 × 2 ANOVA on free recall rates with the factors age (young, older) and state EC (high, low) revealed no main effect of age (F(1,52) = 1.05, p = 0.31, η 2 p = 0.02), but a significant main effect of state EC (F(1,52) = 165.18, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.76), and a marginally significant interaction of age × state EC (F(1,52) = 4.11, p = 0.048, η 2 p = 0.07).

The only difference was that the associations of age with serum glucose and lipid levels became significant, whereas the positive association of extrinsic time pressure with total cholesterol became marginally significant ( p =0.048, but insignificant after applying the Bonferroni correction), and the association of noxious exposures and total cholesterol became insignificant.

At the phylum level, in NBF there was a marginally significant (p = 0.048, Wilcoxon rank sum test) decrease in Bacteroidetes abundances from the dry to the wet season (Fig. 4d ), while Spirochaetes and Actinobacteria increased significantly (p = 0.010 and 0.021, respectively).

There was a marginally significant difference (Global R = 0.03, p = 0.048) in prey importance value percentages between toad sexes in golf course Community B.

Fitting the interaction between 7PS and dataset generated a marginal improvement in the model (Chisq = 10.905, p = 0.02352, df = 3), with the interaction 7PS* 35SNP_historical_cats being marginally significant (est = 0.228 ± 0.11, t = 2.00, p = 0.048).

Similarly, rear-foot stride length did not differ between male mice of different ages and showed only a marginally significant difference between age groups in females (p = 0.048) (Figure 5C,D ).

Although there was no significant difference in vessel diameter between POAG and controls in univariate analysis, in multivariable analysis the difference was marginally significant (p=0.048), with every micron increase in vessel diameter being associated with a 27% reduced odds of POAG (95% CI 0.53 to 0.99).

Although Fringe Benefits was marginally significant in the regression model ( p = 0.048), the corresponding confidence interval of the odds ratio included values very close to the null (OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.65, 0.998]), suggesting that the effect might be weak or unstable.

While there were marginally significant differences in N2 proportion in the whole sample (p=0.048), there were no significant group differences in N2 proportion in the analytic sample (i.e. after the exclusion of 4 studies due to noisy data) used for EEG analysis (p=0.14).

Both mosquito presence and time significantly affected PC1 scores for leaf surface bacterial communities ( F = 45.5, df = 1, 22, P < 0.001; F = 8.44, df = 1, 22, P = 0.011), while scirtids had only a marginally significant effect ( F = 4.6, df = 1, 22, P = 0.048).

For hypothesis 2, results did show significant interactions: at follow-up (T 4 ), BTR-NF participants showed marginally significant improvement compared to MTI (BTR-NF: estimate: −8.14, SE: 4.10, P = 0.048).

With respect to the somatic indices, significant effects on the HSI were found for time and interaction (time: F 2,108 = 41.4; P < 0.001; interaction: F 4,108 = 16.9; P < 0.001), as well as a marginally significant effect of temperature ( F 2,108 = 3.1, P = 0.048).