“marginally significant”

There was a marginally significant effect of test period (χ 2 1 = 3.94, P = 0.047; Fig. 2b ).

Among the three models, combined RS showed independent prognostic power (p=0.0096), and the post-treatment RS was marginally significant (p=0.047), whereas pretreatment RS did not show statistical significance (p=0.058, table 2 ).

4A 1 ), and OP4 (p<0.001) (data shown only for the OP3 component), though OP2 showed a marginally significant interaction effect (p = 0.047).

Results revealed a marginally significant run × group interaction ( F 3, 156 = 2.708, p = .047, η 2 p = .050), while the main effects of run ( F 3, 156 = 1.119, p = .343, η 2 p = .021) and group ( F 1, 52 = 1.774, p = .189, η 2 p = .033) were not significant.

We also detected marginally significant correlations between the reaction times for reading English words and phonological brain loads ( r = −0.309, p = 0.047, uncorrected); and reading Chinese pinyin and logo-grapheme brain loads ( r = 0.303, p = 0.051, uncorrected).

Although χ 2 was marginally significant ( p = 0.047) for the structural covariances model across age groups, constraining all the paths to equality between groups would not cause a significant decrease in model fit. 3.4.

Finally, the interaction between transgression ambiguity and agency was marginally significant F (1,203) = 3.99, p = .047, η 2 = .02.

Even in the post-hoc sensitivity analysis, which yielded a marginally significant pooled effect for the complicated subgroup ( p = 0.047), the between-subgroup contrast remained non-significant ( p = 0.141).

The interaction between group body parts was significant with CT attenuation and CNR (p = 0.002 and 0.003 respectively), and marginally significant with SNR (p = 0.047), with minimal changes noticed between the two groups.

Nonmedicated patients showed a marginally significant increase in COX‐2 expression ( p = 0.047) and a significantly (−62%) reduced cPGES expression in frontal cortex ( p ≤ 0.001), compared to controls.

In these analyses we observed a marginally significant Condition x Trial n Correspondence x Experiment interaction, F 1,38 = 4.21, p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.10.

For the average egg weight, where the group effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.047, F = 2.73), the observed power was approximately 0.65.

Moreover, levels of initial serum creatinine were also marginally significant for prediction of survival in our studied cohort ( P = 0.047, odd ratio 0.003, 95% CI 0.00–0.92).

Greater sKIT change (either as a categorical or continuous variable) and age < 65 (noting that this group represented 98% of patients) were significantly associated with improved OS in the multivariate analyses (p = 0.0085, < 0.0001, and = 0.0045, respectively), while greater VEGF-A change (categorical variable) and age evaluated as a continuous variable showed marginally significant associations (both p = 0.047).

However, a marginally significant difference was observed, with nonexpressers exhibiting a higher elevation in SCr at 1 week post‐transplantation ( p = 0.047). 3.3.

ANOVA also revealed a marginally significant difference for the hydrogen contents ( P < 0.047; Table 2 ), again in favor of MG38 (6.7% dry weight) compared to MIDAS (6.5% dry weight; Table 3 ).

Patients who were ctDNA-positive exhibited a marginally significant reduction in PFS (P=0.047) time and a significantly decreased OS (P=0.005) time compared with those in patients who were ctDNA-negative ( Fig. 2A and B ).

A statistically significant linear increase across the repeated runs was found in the PCC ( R 2 = 0.234, p = 8.89 × 10 −7 ), left insula ( R 2 = 0.107, p = 1.39 × 10 −3 ), and right insula ( R 2 = 0.132, p = 3.47 × 10 −4 ) and marginally significant in the ACC ( R 2 = 0.043, p = 0.047).

Notably, miR-6887-5p exhibited a total effect on keloid formation risk (β = 0.324, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.073–0.576) and a direct effect (β = 0.283, 95% CI: 0.027, 0.538), with a marginally significant mediation effect through B-cell activating factor receptor on CD20− CD38− B cells (β = 0.042, 95% CI: −0.001, 0.084, P = .047).

However, subject age was marginally significant, with younger subjects reporting higher maximum pain (P = 0.047).

The prevalence of undernourishment was marginally significant in Model 1 ( p = 0.047) but not in Model 2.

In a linear regression model including all covariates, years of employment was not significant ( p = 0.908), whereas age was marginally significant ( p = 0.047).

The correlation between systolic BP and VLF was marginally significant ( p = 0.047) ( Table 4 ).

In terms of overall morphology, the different pH treatments had marginally significant effects on both centroid size ( F 5, 80 = 2.36, P = 0.047) and shape ( F 110, 1760 = 1.42, P = 0.049) of the subset of 8-day-old larvae measured.

The result showed that a longer period of POD use was a negative and marginally significant (B=−0.757, S.E.=0.381, p =0.047) predictor of POD contamination.