Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

While these associations are marginally significant owing to the limited sample size, they are largely related to subcortical connections (4 out of 11), with the amygdala-insula connection and caudate-anterior cingulum connection among the smallest p-values, consistent with our previous findings showing reduced brain volumes in the subcortical areas in opioid-exposed infants ( Merhar et al., 2020 ).
In addition to location and sampling time (which includes the difference between bulk soil and rhizosphere) as the main variables defining the microbiome composition, the microbial inoculant applied as a treatment also had a small but significant effect in fungal communities and a marginally significant effect in bacterial communities.
We also found a marginally significant effect of menarche age on WC, indicating that the mean changes of WC in women with late menarche age were lower than those with normal menarche age (− 1.66 cm; 95% CI − 3.46, 0.14; P = 0.070); this marginal effect remained after adjusting for potential confounders (− 1.72 cm; 95% CI − 3.50, 0.07; P = 0.059).
With respect to housework, the evidence on changes in the employment of domestic help in column (5) point in the direction of the first explanation as we can only see a marginally significant reduction in the probability of employing a domestic help in the case where the mother is working in the period directly after the job loss.
In group A, the hazard ratio (HR) was higher in patients with advanced tumor stage, and the presence of liver metastasis was associated with a marginally significant decrease in TOT‐1 (Figure 4 ). 3.5 Multivariate Cox PH analysis of factors affecting TOT‐2 in group A patients In group A patients who received second‐line osimertinib treatment, the presence of liver metastasis was associated with a decrease in TOT‐2 with an HR of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.35–4.40, p = 0.003, Figure [Link] , [Link] , [Link] , [Link] ). 3.6 ORR‐1 and DCR‐1 The results of ORR‐1 and DCR‐1 are shown in Tables S1 and S2 , respectively.