“marginally significant”

Interaction effects were not significant for middle ( F = .709, p = .494) and late stages ( F = 2.98, p = .055), though a marginally significant trend suggested a potential advantage of VR modality in later stages.

It is noteworthy that a marginally significant interaction effect was observed in the sex subgroup ( P for interaction = 0.079): a significant positive association was found between LnRCII and mortality risk in male patients (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.36–2.06), whereas the association observed in female patients was not statistically significant (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.96–2.07), suggesting a stronger association in males.

However, after FDR correction for multiple comparisons, only the negative correlation between AAI and SUA remained significant, while the correlations between AAI and TPBD, and between SUA and TPDC, became marginally significant.

At age 2, the odds were marginally significant [OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00–1.16].

The chi-square test showed significant differences for all risk factors by latent classes except for overweight/obesity, which was marginally significant, and low fruit/vegetable intake—the p -values were 0.061 and 0.886, respectively.

Difference in wound healing mean score between two groups was significant at both the 7th day and 14th day whereas it was marginally significant with 10% probability on day 3 and non-significant on day 21 ( Table 7 ).

Regarding the self- and informant report version of the PID-5-BF + M, a marginally significant result of a small effect size was found for the Unusual Beliefs and Experiences facet.

The differences between grade 1 and grade 2 (OR = 3.81, p = 0.080) and between grade 3 and grade 4 (OR = 3.34, p = 0.078) were marginally significant.

Within the EXP-M domain, the Goals subscale exhibited a marginally significant negative effect (β=-0.04, t=-1.84), consistent with the criterion that p-values between .05 and .10 indicate marginal significance (Olsson-Collentine et al. , 2019 ), suggesting a trend whereby greater agreement on therapeutic goals was associated with slightly lower average experiential depth.

There was a marginally significant group difference in paranoia, where patients showed higher levels than controls.

Unlike the left IPS and left IFG, we observed in dmPFC a marginally significant correlation with behavioral sensitivity at change-inconsistent signals as well.

p -values between 0.05 and 0.1 were considered marginally significant.

Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution, particularly for marginally significant associations. 3.

However, marginally significant differences were observed between the formulations MN1, MN2, and MN3, with p -values of 0.0525 at pH 7.4 and 0.053 at pH 2, suggesting a consistent trend toward higher cumulative release from MN3 under both conditions.

However, the slope difference between LOCI and control clinics was marginally significant ( b =.06, 95%CI [-0.02, .13]), suggesting that LOCI exposure may have mitigated the negative VA trajectory for those clinics.

We found that short-term exposure to wildfire-related PM 2.5 shows a strong and statistically significant association with COVID-19 infections (15% increase, RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09–1.21), while other respiratory infections (e.g., acute bronchitis, pneumonia) show weaker or marginally significant associations.

In the non-PDR subgroup, a marginally significant negative linear trend was consistent with the overall population (P overall = 0.071, P nonlinear = 0.253).

Nevertheless, we acknowledge the limited merit of these mediation analyses when correlations are weak and marginally significant.

The index of moderated mediation is 0.0084 (95% CI [0.0004, 0.0171]), suggesting a marginally significant moderated mediation effect whereby the indirect path from DG to PPC through Adbur shifts from negative to positive as violation costs increase, but remains modest in magnitude. 5 Conclusions and policy implications This study explores the internal mechanisms and boundary conditions through which public perceptions of digital government influence policy compliance during a public health emergency.

Associations between genetic variants in the leptin-melanocortin pathway and obesity risk Most genetic variants in controls were confirmed to follow HWE, with the exception of rs3746619 in MC3R , which showed a marginally significant departure after permutation correction ( P permutation = 0.046, S1 Table ).

When stratified by debriefing presence, interventions without debriefing demonstrated marginally significant improvements in skill performance (Hedges’ g = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.00–0.87), while those incorporating debriefing showed a larger but nonsignificant effect (Hedges’ g = 0.57, 95% CI: −1.24–2.38).

There was no significant association among women younger than 35 years, but a marginally significant inverse association in women aged 35 years or older (P for interaction = 0.03).

edictors (OR = 1.684, 95% CI: 1.289–2.209, P = 0.0001)), radiotherapy as a significant positive predictor (OR = 5.264, 95% CI: 1.033–26.850, P = 0.0458), and high educational level (OR = 5.963, 95% CI: 0.985–36.210, P = 0.0521) and endocrine therapy (OR = 5.308, 95% CI: 0.993–28.320, P = 0.0510) as marginally significant positive predictors.

Low food caused a much larger increase in the reproductive lifespan of guppies from low- as opposed to high-predation localities, which in turn resulted in a marginally significant interaction between food availability and predation.

Genes that retained significance post‐adjustment are designated as jointly significant genes, whereas those that failed to retain their significance are termed marginally significant genes, according to the classification outlined in reference. 15 2.4 Focus analysis To investigate the interrelationships among various traits linked to specific genetic locales, we utilized the fine‐mapping technique known as FOCUS. 16 FOCUS is designed to identify the causal links of genetic variations (or genes) with complex traits by analyzing associations within a genomic region.