“marginally significant”

Test results were considered as significant when \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text {p}\,<\,0.05$$\end{document} p < 0.05 and as marginally significant (trend of significance) when \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text {p}\,<\,0.1$$\end{document} p < 0.1 .

Table S5 shows that the interaction between age and PM 2.5 was not significant (linear interaction P -value = 0.08 and non-linear interaction P -value = 0.06), while Table S6 shows the interaction between age and PM 10 had a marginally significant effect on serum 25OHD levels (linear P -value for interaction = 0.045 and non-linear P -value for interaction = 0.04).

In a generalized estimating equations logistic regression model adjusted for four socioeconomic variables, imputations for missing values for marital status and race, and inverse probability weighting to account for attrition, there were marginally significant effects for improved strong agreement with the statements, “If I visit my health care provider on a regular basis, I will be a healthy new mother” as well as “Drinking alcohol will harm the health of my developing baby.” The Text4baby intervention had no effects on any of the measured behaviors (e.g., alcohol use).

Siassakos et al 32 reported OR of 0.23 (95% CI 0.01–4.90), whereas the study from Copson et al 33 reported a marginally significant increased OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.03–5.72).

For the most part, the income measures are not associated with positive social behavior, with the exception of a small marginally significant and positive correlation between income trend and positive social behavior.

The only predictor in both groups of respondents (nonaggressive: p = 0.024 and aggressive: p = 0.022) was the total value of scores on the PANSS scale, but, due to the correction for multiple testing, its effect remained marginally significant.

Grain Yield The yield of grain (t/ha) was significantly affected by the Rht-1 and Ppd-D1 genes, while TaGS2-A1 had a marginally significant effect if the interaction of the genes had been accounted ( Table S6 ).

Specifically, the highest quartile (Q4) showed a significantly elevated risk (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.53–3.22, p < 0.001), while Q2 and Q3 exhibited smaller and marginally significant effects.

Biomass was a significant predictor of soil Ca and a marginally significant predictor for K, but not for N as soil samples were taken years after carcass decomposition (Fig. 2 and Table 1 ).

In addition to being a significant predictor of burnout, insight was marginally significant in predicting STS.

Secondly, to account for competing risks (e.g., death), a multinomial logistic regression model was applied, yielding results highly consistent with the main analysis: the mild-to-moderate symptom group showed a significantly elevated risk of MCI, and severe symptoms also exhibited a marginally significant positive association.

Associations between SUVR and tau threads were marginally significant (Figure 2D‐F).

Copper showed an inverse association with the Aβ42/40 ratio, while zinc was positively associated with the Aβ42/40 ratio, though these associations were marginally significant.

For all statistical tests, a significance threshold of p < 0.05 was adopted, and p values between 0.05 and 0.10 were regarded as marginally significant.

The analysis categorizes genes into 2 groups: jointly significant genes, whose results remain significant, and marginally significant genes, which become non-significant.

At the aggregate level, women are 5.0 percentage points more likely to report any ACE, a difference that is marginally significant at the 10% level.

PM10 (8 studies) The fixed-effects model indicated a marginally significant association (aOR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01–1.07), but heterogeneity was high ( I 2 = 76.5%).

Although the p-value was slightly above the conventional 0.05 threshold, the confidence interval did not include zero, indicating a marginally significant mediation pathway.

Except for the posture of the upper extremities (marginally significant) all mean values of the subsystems revealed significant differences with larger values in the conflict interaction indicating less postural similarity.

Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons revealed a marginally significant difference between the UC and CD groups [Mdiff = 4.179, 95% CI (−0.09, 8.45), P adj = 0.056].

Table 1 presents the covariates used for propensity score matching, and all covariates were significant (P-values < 0.05) except depression (p-value = 0.052) was marginally significant.

Furthermore, excitability ( OR = 1.034, 95% CI : 0.999, 1.043, p = 0.054) and emotionality ( OR = 1.031, 95% CI : 0.997, 1.066, p = 0.079) exhibited marginally significant positive trends ( Table 3 ). 3.3.

There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between the transparency manipulation and participant language.

The association between left hippocampus‐DMN RSFC and MBI global scores was significantly moderated by WMHV (β[95%CI]=‐0.83[‐1.57,‐0.08]) and showed a marginally significant moderation by GFAP (β[95%CI]=‐0.74[‐1.51,0.03]).

A 1 SD increase in the proportion of African American residents was linked with a 1.41% decrease in road construction activity and a marginally significant reduction in non-single-family homes, a proxy for mixed land use.