“marginally significant”

The results in Table S7 support the main analysis in that they indicate a marginally significant interaction between air pollution and PA as well as a reduction in the health advantages of PA at exposure levels above the median ( P for interaction =0.072).

Results decomposing this interaction showed marginally significant regression lines by gender.

A similar study in 2023 involving 211 women with GDM also observed no differences in birthweight between groups, although birth length showed a marginally significant improvement in the intervention group [ 64 ].

If the SNPs located in sites related to promoter DNase binding, enhancer histone binding and transcript binding, the marginally significant SNPs play regulatory roles affecting protein binding or the presence of eQTL [ 45 , 46 ].

The proportion of mixed papyrus within a patch negatively influenced the chance of survival for three of the species, shown to be marginally significant for Papyrus Canary (RI = 1), but not significant for Greater Swamp‐warbler (RI = 1) or White‐winged Swamp‐warbler (RI = 0.17).

Second, concerning long-term settlement intentions, Hukou reform shows a marginally significant positive effect (0.011) at the 10% level in the full sample.

In addition, participants showed smaller P2 amplitudes in LEPs when they were listening to music (statistically significant) or white noise (marginally significant) in comparison to sitting in silence.

For sub-category negative , there was a marginally significant difference (p-value 0.075, with more negative messages in treatment D).

For all statistical analyses, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant while P < 0.1 was considered marginally significant, and all plots were considered independent replicates.

At the same time, a marginally significant burden on T2D was observed in CMC T 2 and CMC regression analysis in the new gene SLC38A11 (Table 2 ).

A p -value of less than 0.05 was considered significant, while a p -value of between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered marginally significant. 2.3.1.

The association between HFI and MMF in our study was marginally significant.

In contrast, the comparisons between MA and NaiveBayes ( p = 0.0574), MA and XGBoost ( p = 0.0500), and MA and LightGBM ( p = 0.0580) yield marginally significant results.

The difference of −0.125 LogMAR between oblique and WTR cylinders is marginally significant with a p-value of 0.0556.

In FRP studies, the evidence is more mixed; here, marginally significant effects (e.g., Dimigen et al., 2012 ), polarity-reversed effects (Degno et al., 2019a ), but also robust N400 effects (Mirault et al., 2020 ; Li et al., 2024 ) have been reported.

In 2015–2020, diet contributions by small pelagic prey decreased in all segments of the population and led to marginally significant differences in diet between adult males and females.

First, a marginally significant interaction between ‘speaker’ and ‘non-verbal cue’ indicated that children followed pointing cues over labeling more often in the robot than in the human condition, while they followed eye gaze over labeling more often in the human than in the robot condition (Est. = -2.891, SE = 1.457, z = -1.973, p = .048).

The results showed that the process of being present was a significant moderator of the relation between loneliness and depression and the process of committed action was marginally significant.

Although marginally significant, both giving and receiving emotional & instrumental support appear to have an influence on the onset of depressive symptoms (Table 2 ).

A p value between 0.1 and 0.05 was considered marginally significant, a p value between 0.01 and 0.05 was considered significant, 0.001 and 0.01 highly significant, and <0.001 very highly significant.

Moreover, across the treatments, the correlations between the diversity indices and ORAC values were weakly negative and marginally significant for Chao1, Fisher’s alpha, and ACE ( S7 Table ).

Sex and age showed marginally significant associations, but, perhaps surprisingly, prior duration and age of onset of depression and BMI were unrelated to relative dose.

For those included studies with a reported adjusted OR (aOR), previous CS was significantly associated with an increased risk of bladder injury (aOR=2.58, 95% CI=1.63–4.10, 3 studies), but was also marginally significant for the risk of ureteric injury (aOR=1.44; 95% CI=0.96–2.15, 1 study).

Additionally, there were three RSFCs that showed marginally significant negative correlations with MoCA scores.

Next, parental satisfaction with child’s education showed only a marginally significant correlation with quality of life, even though this relationship has been confirmed in previous studies (Frantzen et al., 2016 ; Hodgetts et al., 2017 ).