“marginally significant”

This slightly lower AIC but slightly higher BIC is consistent with the marginally significant coefficients reported in Table 2 .

Any findings in the subgroup analyses could be spurious due to multiple testing as these were done upon a review request, data driven, and only presented with some marginally significant interactions.

However, it is noteworthy that the distal pathway in the serial mediation model (digital technology use → emotional intelligence → learning engagement →English academic performance) exhibited marginally significant t-value (1.389), suggesting statistical uncertainty in this indirect effect.

However, in the fully adjusted Model 3, only niacin retained a marginally significant association with gallstone risk (OR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–1.00).

Consider replacing with “marginally significant” or simply report the p-values without interpretation. 3-2.Model Justification in Methods:Though addressed in the response letter, a brief explanation in the manuscript text of why dichotomization was necessary (due to assumption violations) would improve transparency for readers. 3-3.Mood Assessment Limitations:Consider briefly discussing how a single-item mood measure may not differentiate between positive and negative affect, which may explain some differences from Titone et al. or Depp et al. 4.Conclusion: The authors have made substantive improvements in response to the first review.

The results indicated that AUC-positive and AUC-negative showed significant or marginally significant effects on multiple aspects of mental health (see in Fig. 3 ; summarized in Table S1), including general mental well-being (AUC-positive: β = 0. 284, 95 % CI = [0.147, 0.421], p < .001; AUC-negative: β = −0.133, 95 % CI = [−0.27, 0.004], p = .057), depression proneness (AUC-positive: β = −0.131, 95

Overall, the factors that affected growth significantly were the concentration of N, P, Zn, Cu, B, Mn, Mo, Fe and vitamin solution and N source in the case of mutant 8G, the concentration of N, P, Ca, Cu and N source, and Zn was marginally significant for 7Y growth and the concentration of N, P, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Ni and N source for mutant 31 W (Fig. 1 a and b).

As shown in Table 7 (with full annotations in the Supporting Information ), we found 37 mediators in total, of which 14 were significant at pFDR < 0.05, and 23 were marginally significant at pFDR < 0.10.

The results were marginally significant ( P BH <0.10) when considering the MGI Mammalian Phenotype functional sets, which identified terms related to vertebrae morphology.

However, canopy cover effects on leaf traits in genotype 36 were significant only for quercetins and marginally significant for total flavonoids, whereas in genotype O154, increased canopy cover around focal trees was associated with significantly reduced concentrations of total phenolics and flavonoids and a marginally significant reduction in condensed tannins (Table 4 ). 3.4 Effects of Leaf Traits and DBH on Herbivory Relationships between leaf traits, DBH and herbivory differed between the two genotypes (Figure 3 ).

Within biomes, fleas and hosts demonstrated marginally significant differences in FDS in steppes and temperate forests due to differences in the functional diversity component.

Subjects with the highest nitrate intake from animal sources had odds 1.23 times higher level of having the highest level of TMAO compared to the reference group, which was marginally significant.

The interaction between NDVI and sex remained marginally significant after model averaging of the models with the combined AICc weight of 0.95 ( Supplementary Table S7 ).

Anxiety associated with reduced odds of vaccination There was some indication that teachers with higher levels of anxiety were less likely to be vaccinated; with the marginally significant effect in Model 2 becoming significant after controlling for gubernatorial party in Model 3.

We also found a marginally significant effect of psilocybin on the flow of experience dimension.

Although some post hoc corrections were applied, comprehensive adjustment methods such as FDR were not used, which may warrant caution in interpreting marginally significant findings.

There was also a marginally significant effect of P. asiatica × T. mongolicum × N. cataria on the competitive effect of species L. japonicus on C. dactylon ( Table 1 H): without N. cataria , the presence of P. asiatica had no impact on the competitive effect of L. japonicus on C. dactylon in the absence of T. mongolicum , but aggravated it in the presence of T. mongolicum ; with N. cataria , the presence of P. asiatica aggravated the competitive effect of L. japonicus on C. dactylon , but such an impact was much weaker in the presence than in the absence of T. mongolicum ( Figure 1 H).

They conveyed a marginally significant decrease in motor preparation in active stimulation after prime presentation during 280 and 380 ms.

This difference was supported by the effect size of Care and Character on the criterion, predictors that were marginally significant in the first tested model (i.e., Table 4 ).

Although the BACP group exhibited a higher mean occlusion percentage than SACP, their difference was marginally significant ( SACP vs.

Across all six chemotype‐specific models and at all time points in both years, plot‐level chemotype richness had marginally significant negative effects on the mean number of stems per plot.

Of note, two recent Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have attempted to demonstrate a genetic causal association between T2D and POAG based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, but there was significant variability in the results: the causal association between T2D and POAG was marginally significant in populations of European ancestry but not in other populations. 9 18 Therefore, it is important to further search for specific genomic variants or loci that explain genome-wide genetic correlations and to delve deeper into the common genetic aetiology and mechanisms between these two diseases. 19

reported a marginally significant difference in mean scores between different states of civil status [ 7 ].

Indeed, HPD in 1% atropine treated eyes was greater than in 0.1% atropine treated eyes in 6/8 timepoints, with a marginally significant p value of .047.

Following convention, the alpha level of significance was set at 5 %, hence values where p ≤ 0.05 have been referred to as ‘‘significant’’ and those where 0.05≤p ≤ 0.10 as a ‘‘trend’’ or ‘‘marginally significant’’.