Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

7 It is to be noted that in the present study all recorded RTs were included in the analysis, unlike other studies in the field in which some extreme RTs were excluded from the analysis, thus, this probably contributing to the marginally significant results in the present study. 8 In lateralization studies, slow mode of processing in the RH has also been studied by cross-hemispheric presentation of word stimuli at a short SOA (e.g., Abernethy and Coney, 1996 ; Korsnes and Magnussen, 2007 ).
One study reported that age as covariate in statistical analysis did not improve the performance of 18 F-FGD PET [ 45 ]; another found that in participants under 75 years this biomarker was only a marginally significant predictor and in participants over 75 did not predict conversion [ 68 ].
Each 50-point increase in credit score was associated with a trend toward a lower risk of reporting poor overall health: marginally significant findings of 5% lower odds of in the next 1 year, a 7% lower odds in the next 2 years, and a statistically significant finding of 13% lower by 3 years.
Comparing participants at the highest (≥29.8 MET-h/d) versus lowest quartile (<10.7 MET-h/d) of physical activity, there were 18–23% statistically significant lower risks among those with low air pollution exposure, but marginally significant elevated risks among those with high air pollution exposure (for PM 2.5 and NO 2 ).
A UK study showed a marginally significant increase of lung cancer in CB production workers [ 15 ], however, the follow-up investigation demonstrated that this increase was not related to cumulative CB exposure, but a combination of factors including prevalence of smoking, previous occupations, social class, and regional effects unrelated to smoking habits [ 16 ].
The samples were split into two sets in order to save DNA and reduce genotyping costs: the first set (n = 2270 cases and 2280 controls) was genotyped for all SNPs and the second set (n = 2203 cases and 2280 controls) were then tested for those SNPs that showed marginally significant associations in set 1 (P-heterogeneity or P-trend<0.1).
Eight of the sixty-one QTL were marginally significant, having been identified at the α = 0.1 permutation threshold during CIM; the remainder exceeded the α = 0.05 permutation threshold and all of these QTL were confirmed via MIM.
Genetic analysis of safflower domestication.
BMC Plant Biol · 2014 · PMC3925122