“marginally significant”

Positive identification was not affected by any variable, with the exception of people with permanence between 20 and 40 years, who identified the huillín less than those with permanence of less than 20 years; however, this tendency is marginally significant (z-value: − 2.004; p = 0.2691, Table 2 ).

At higher levels of couple satisfaction, the relationship was marginally significant ( b = 0.11, SE = 0.10, 95%CI [-0.09, 0.32], p = .28), see Fig. 2 .

We detected a marginally significant trend of an increased number of saccades on incidence of malaise [0.05 (Nagelkerkes), 0.032 (Cox and Snell), χ 2 = 9.75, p = 0.283].

A tendency for a spatial bias to left-side targets was found after solving subtraction problems, but the difference of RTs to left and right side targets was marginally significant, F (1,26) = 1.078, p = 0.309, η 2 = 0.040.

At the slowest tempo (IOI = 750 ms) and at the fastest tempo (IOI = 450 ms), children and adolescents who stutter tapped more in advance of the pacing event than controls did [750 ms, F (1,59) = 5.67, p = 0.02; 450 ms, F (1,59) = 3.82, p = 0.06, marginally significant; 600 n.s., p = 0.31].

But in the placebo group, tinnitus severity was reduced in 38.5% and 50% of subjects, respectively, that the latter was marginally significant (P = 0.33, P = 0.05) ( Tables 2 and 3 ).

Biosets characterizing GH receptor truncated at amino acid 569 ( GSE11396 , GSE988 ), were either not significant or were marginally significant for feminization (p-value = 0.33 and 3.8E-05, respectively), consistent with the weak to moderate effects of this mutant on GH-dependent phosphorylation of STAT5b [ 54 ].

A marginally significant improvement of ITR (ITR: S2–S1 = 0.25, SEM = 0.18, Z value = 1.4, p = 0.34; ITR: S3–S1 = 0.40, SEM = 0.18, Z value = 2.19, p = 0.07; ITR: S3–S2 = 0.14, SEM = 0.18, Z value = 0.79, p = 0.71) was shown from session 1 to session 3 in the group average results of all 42 subjects; a close to significant level of ITR improvement was only found in the low BCI performance group (ITR lowBCIperformance : S3–S1 = 0.22, SEM = 0.10, Z value = 2.23, p = 0.066), which is marked as a dot in Figure 2I .

AST was marginally significant (OR = 0.989, p = 0.345), while globulin and hemoglobin were not independently predictive.

As regards agreement about the best codon for any amino acid at any position, using as above mean null concordance and doing one binomial test for the tiles overall, the P -value is again marginally significant (binomial test, 75 successes from 173 trials with weight mean null expectation p = 0.36: P = 0.048, two tailed, 62 expected under the null of no agreement; Supplementary Fig.

Negative F is in 11 out of 13 sites indicated no inbreeding; in fact, there was marginally significant heterozygote excess at 4 sites (NBB, ANT, STP, and NYK; Table 1 ); and F is levels were similar at both time points ( p = .37).

On the 10-Mb scale, the difference was marginally significant for only the MS map (SA: LL null = 2,697, LL β = 2,698, LLR = 1.953, P = 0.3766; MS: LL null = 1,590, LL β = 1,593, LLR = 5.055; P = 0.0799; FS: LL null = −493.2, LL β = −493.0, LLR = 0.3789; P = 0.8274).

There were no significant effects of activities completed and only a marginally significant quadratic relation for week in study (β for linear term=.3; P =.38; β for quadratic term=−.06; t 45 =−1.89; P =.07; 95% CI −0.125 to 0.004).

Moreover, we observed marginally significant, 5- to 10-fold decreases in daf-16 ( P value = 0.381) or DAF-16 target sod-3 ( P value = 0.0476) mRNA expression, respectively, when CF1935 worms were fed L4440-harboring bacteria ( Supplementary Figure S3A and B ).

Similarly, the timing of activity was marginally significant towards a later timing of activity in the acute, but not total depression group (total: B = 0.206, p = 0.398; acute: B = 0.405, p = 0.084).

This lower performance in ALT in the immediate test was due to a (marginally significant) performance drop of performance in ALT from the last 5 trials at the end of training (at which time there was no difference (two tailed t -test, P = 0.40) between ALT and LONG-ITI) to the first immediate test ( P = 0.05) Dissociation of time and interference-induced between-trial forgetting Between-trial forgetting due to either time or interferences or both during training was assessed by taking the difference in performance between conditions (see Methods ).

The interaction term in the ANOVA is significant only for the SOV measure (p = 0.0272), and marginally significant for the correctly predicted residues (p = 0.402).

No significant or marginally significant differences in efficacy between disease subgroups were observed (treatment-by-subgroup-by-time interaction; P = 0.41).

combination, p = 0.042), brachial nerve block approach ( p = 0.070), usage of tourniquet ( p = 0.070), NRS pain score with movement ( p = 0.047) before block administration and sleep quality score on the night before surgery ( p = 0.066) were found to be significantly associated with rebound pain (marginally significant); thus, we included these factors and fracture location ( p = 0.430) in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

For men however, the increase in vaccinations happens only for the Both treatment, which incorporates both the individual and community benefits of the vaccine, while for the Others treatment, the association is marginally significant (Proportion tests: Baseline = Self , p = 0.433; Baseline = Others , p = 0.095; Baseline = Both , p < 0.001).

Analyses revealed a small but significant overall effect of distributing practice on acquisition performance ( η 2 = .127, p <.001) and a marginally significant effect on retention performance ( η 2 = .108, p = 0.44).

The comparison between the highest and lowest GI categories did not indicate a marginally significant association (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.94–1.16; P -value = 0.44) (Table 3 ).

The HR for IBTR in patients with a Ki-67 ≥ 14%, a marginally significant risk factor for IBTR in all patients, was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.08-3.11; P = 0.45).

While it is marginally significant on its own as an additional predictor for NAL+, the K:T ratio is not significant when AA is already included (p = 0.47).

The association between the two variables could be shown to be marginally significant (Spearman P =.47 and P =.07, respectively).