“marginally significant”

Sex of the individual was found to only be marginally significant ( p = 0.15, 0.05, 0.02 for microfilaraemia, antigenaemia and mf count, respectively), with males having an increased risk of microfilaraemia, antigenaemia and mf count.

However, only a marginally significant difference between the social motivation–IGD correlation and the immersion motivation–IGD correlation was identified ( P =.15).

All the variables with at least a marginally significant association with the total DAP level ( p < 0.15) were considered for the multivariable model.

At each step, models were retained if the newly added gene was at least marginally significant (p-value <0.15) and all other genes were significant (p-value <0.05).

Mental rotation z ‐scores of women who received MMN did not differ from those who received IFA (unadjusted B = 0.05; 95% CI [−0.16, 0.27]; p = .83; adjusted B = 0.01; 95% CI [−0.17, 0.20]; p = .98) or LNS, though this difference was marginally significant in the adjusted analysis (unadjusted B = 0.17; 95% CI [−0.05, 0.39]; p = .15; adjusted B = 0.19; 95% CI [0.00, 0.38]; p = .054).

For 2-level independent variables in all cases of marginally significant effects ( p < 0.15), Bayes factors [JZS BFs, with scaled r = 0.707, as in Rouder et al.

For men, the CT genotype did not show a significant association (OR = 1.051, 95% CI = 0.962–1.149, P = 0.272), while the TT genotype was marginally significant (OR = 1.116, 95% CI = 0.960–1.298, P = 0.152).

The indirect effect was β = 0.14 (95% CI: 0.045-0.235), suggesting potential mediation, though the direct effect remained marginally significant (p = 0.154).

The Mann–Whitney U test comparing silicosis risk scores before and after web application deployment revealed a marginally significant reduction in mean rank scores (U = 41,085, p = 0.155).

ANCOVA Analysis for MDA When Time II MDA values were analyzed with Time I as a covariate, the group effect was not significant—F(1,37) = 0.54, p = 0.466—while the baseline covariate was marginally significant: F(1,37) = 2.08, p = 0.157.

A marginally significant interaction of difficulty and tDCS stimulation was observed ( F 1,9 = 2.26, p = 0.16).

We also found the shorter sleepers had relatively fewer night wakes in both the ABCD and SSBC datasets ( p = 0.051 for the ABCD study and p = 0.161 for the Shanghai dataset; marginally significant), indicating higher sleep efficiency in these adolescents.

mansoni infection and an increased level of fecal calprotectin in children (100 μg/g: P = 0.414; 150 μg/g: P = 0.598), and only a marginally significant association in mothers (100 μg/g: P = 0.162; 150 μg/g: P = 0.075). 25 Fecal occult blood.

The rest of the variables showed no statistically significant differences; however, the % of PVH variation showed to be marginally significant ( p = 0.163).

K D values obtained for tagless BRAF (mean ± SD for dimer: 25.5 ± 4.1 nM, n = 4; monomer: 35.5 ± 0.4 nM, n = 2) were similar to those for MBP‐BRAF (Table 1 ), with negligible or marginally significant differences (dimer: p = 0.164, monomer: p = 0.0464).

The simple main effect of congruency was marginally significant in the HMA group [ F (1,13) = 2.09, p = 0.17], indicating that congruent probes were processed faster ( M = 627 ms) than incongruent probes ( M = 814 ms).

The KUS121-treated and control groups showed marginally significant differences in terms of a-wave amplitude (157.6 ± 72.5 μV vs. 119.3 ± 34.4 μV, P = 0.170; Fig. 3b ).

Despite the negative trend in μ S , a high level of resilience R C for warm conditions was maintained across the LUI gradient (linear mixed model (lme), F 1,35 =3.8, P =0.060; with a marginally significant increase that was consistent across regions, F 1,35 =0.5, P =0.181).

This effect was marginally significant ( β = −0.12, p = 0.19, η 2 = 0.02).

A marginally significant difference ( P = 0.19) was observed for adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern, with lower adherence in children whose parents underestimated their weight as compared with those who correctly perceived it.

The RS‐Combined effect was marginally significant (mean difference = 0.45, p = 0.19), but individual timepoint analyses confirm robust improvements.

Regarding acceptability judgment errors, the analysis showed a marginally significant GRAMMATICALITY effect in the analysis by item [ F1 (1, 23) = 1.8, p = 0.193; F2 (1, 253) = 3.03, p = 0.083] revealing higher accuracy for the ungrammatical sentences as compared to the grammatical ones (92.74% vs. 90.95%).

Significant and marginally significant linear and polynomial regressions are shown for each enzyme and each soil characteristic, P <0.2.

Any biomarker with a marginally significant p value ( p < 0.20) for either a main effect or interaction will be eligible for the risk stratification model and continued in the Validation Phase.

Marginally significant variables with p < 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.