Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0430.9× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons performed with Mann-Whitney U-test between the species showed that there was a marginally significant difference in the mean grain size between the Barn and the Red-rumped Swallows (U = 8, p = 0.043) but a non-significant trend between the Barn Swallows and the House Martins (U = 12, p = 0.058).
marginally significantp = .0430.9× alphagold
Specifically, in the dramatic progress group, there was a marginally significant increase in global efficiency ( z = 2.020, p = .043, FDR critical value = .033), marginally significant decrease in modularity ( z = −1.933, p = .053, FDR critical value = .036), and a significant increase in average weighted degree centrality ( z = 2.230, p = .026, FDR critical value = .032), all
marginally significantp = 0.0430.9× alphagold
If the Sand Island pair is excluded as an outlier (based on the extreme number of snails found in the Sand Island All Hosts plot, Table 1 ), then the baseline number of snails still does not differ between treatments, but the difference in recolonization rate between treatments becomes marginally significant (Wilcoxon, Z = 2.02, n = 5, p = 0.043).
marginally significantp = .0430.9× alphagold
Late gamma-band activity A similar pattern was seen in later gamma-band activity (200–800 ms post-stimulus), with pASD demonstrating marginally significant increases in evoked gamma-band power and controls showing decreased power in LOC ( F (1, 49) = 4.32, p = .043) and SMG ( F (1, 49) = 4.26, p = .044) (see Figure 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0430.9× alphagold
The mixed ANOVA comparing High and Low CA-BAT Performance groups’ Urge to Move ratings to the High Complexity and Random drumbeats yielded a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (F(1,28) = 4.492, p = 0.043, η 2 G = 0.022) driven by a small effect in the High Beat Perception Performance group (F(1,14) = 5.189, p = 0.039, η 2 G = 0.077) showing higher ratings for the High Complexity relative to the Random drumbeat that was absent in the Low Beat Perception Performance group (F(1,14) = 0.115, p = 0.740, η 2 G < 0.001).
Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings.
Sci Rep · 2022 · PMC9270355