“marginally significant”

Additionally, associations of common femoral IMT with the 4‐m walk score were marginally significant; participants in tertiles 2 (0.68–0.82 mm) and 3 (>0.82 mm) had approximately half the odds of a perfect 4‐m walk score (Table 3 ), P =0.11, P =0.08, respectively.

This was not significant for density of outfield-grazing sheep ( t = -0.44, P = 0.66), but marginally significant for the number of sheep grazing outfields; t = 1.66, P = 0.11) and cattle grazing outfields (number: t = 1.59, P = 0.13, densities: t = -1.56, P = 0.13).

3 , we found a marginally significant effect of Age Group ( F = 2.63, p = 0.11), a significant main effect of Aβ status ( F = 5.28, p = 0.03), and a marginal interaction ( F = 2.93, p = 0.09).

Although no significant diversification rate shifts were detected with apTreeshape, one marginally significant case was identified (p = 0.11) for the divergence of clade B2, i.e. ∼1.7 Myr ago.

With clone pair 4607/4608 (Figure 1 c), after 3-days of water deficit there was greater tillering of E+ plants, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.110 based on t max , p = 0.019 based on t values).

Interestingly, at day 10, bees exposed to imidacloprid had a slightly lower number of spores than bees non-exposed to imidacloprid suggesting a slight inhibiting effect of imidacloprid on spore germination; a difference that was marginally significant between groups of bees individually infected with Nosema (control versus imidacloprid: P = 0.11, Nosema versus Nosema × imidacloprid: P = 0.051).

The only consistent effect observed on error rate was a marginally significant increase associated with more PCR cycles ( p =0.11 - see Fig. 5 a ).

The linear mixed-effect model revealed a marginally significant main effect of gender, χ ( 1 ) 2 = 2.63, p = 0.11, indicating that, overall, girls tended to perform better than boys (other p 's > 0.33).

Results indicated that there was a marginally significant interaction effect between gender and parental status of applicant on recommendation for hire [ F (1, 838) = 2.59; p = 0.11], such that fathers ( M = 5.63; SD = 1.00) might be more likely to be recommended for hire than non-fathers ( M = 5.39; SD = 1.07), while there was no difference between mothers ( M = 5.57; SD = 1.06) and non-mothers ( M = 5.58; SD = 1.09).

PWID who lived in counties with greater percentages of unaffordable rental housing units among low-income households were less likely to report homelessness in the past year; this association was marginally significant (OR=0.97; 95% CI=0.94 to 1.01; p=0.110).

Treatment by soil depth interaction was significant (p < 0.05) at Balducchi and La Blanca, while main effects of treatment (p = 0.05) and soil depth (p < 0.05) were significant at La Hansa, and only soil depth resulted in a marginally significant effect (p = 0.11) at San Alfredo (Fig. 3 ) (Supplementary material 1 , Appendix A).

The predictive power of IS was marginally significant [HR 1.05 (0.99–1.12) per % of LV mass, p = 0.11].

The intervention had direct effects on team culture, which was significantly associated with subsequent fidelity (ps<.05), although the full indirect 2-1-2 path was marginally significant (p=.11).

Regarding the clinical characteristics with binomial values, Streptococcus was marginally associated with sex (P = 0.05; Table 4 ), whereas Fusobacterium was associated with tissue infiltration, although the difference in CTs was marginally significant (P = 0.11; Supplementary Table S2 ).

28 In the group of 20 patients who underwent both ASD repair surgery and tricuspid valvuloplasty, the VRA incision also resulted in a shorter ACC time (58.6 ± 29.2 minutes vs 82.6 ± 27.0 minutes) and CPB time (135.4 ± 35.6 minutes vs 161.9 ± 35.3 minutes) than the CON incision, although the difference was marginally significant ( P = .11 and P = .07, respectively) due to the small sample size.

Decision control preference was considered marginally significant ( p = 0.11).

Although Ace and Ant became marginally significant ( P = 0.111 and 0.096 , respectively), likely owing to reduced statistical power from the smaller number of incident cases at the higher threshold, their effect directions and magnitudes (ORs) remained stable.

Interestingly, unlike the RT analysis, the interaction between group and task type was marginally significant: F (1, 2) = 2.681, P = 0.111, η 2 = 0.073.

It is essential to consider that, while gender and education may not directly impact accessibility, marital status shows a marginally significant effect (B = -0.387, p = 0.112), indicating a possible influence on ART affordability and accessibility.

Nevertheless, the association between COVID-19 policy index and changes in PA level should be viewed with caution, because the correlations can only be classified as marginally significant ( p = 0.112).

This factor was marginally significant, F (2, 38) = 2.314, MSE = 0.021, p = 0.113, η 2 p = 0.114; Figure 2B presents the means (and SE s) for this effect.

The results showed that measured fluid balance has a marginally significant correlation with weight changes (r = 0.195; p = 0.113), indicating that the accuracy of the measured fluid balance in our study was barely satisfactory. 3.3 Associations between Fluid-Related Factors and Treatment Outcome According to univariate analysis, fluid balance before FIT was slightly significantly lower in infants successfully responding to FIT compared to those with failed closure of hsPDA [31.82 (18.01, 39.66) vs 34.68 (25.31, 43.56); p = 0.049; Table 3 , Fig. 2 A].

Gly was increased significantly by 26.5% ( p = 0.014) in the brain tissues, while Ser showed a marginally significant increase of 17.9% ( p = 0.113) in plasma.

Continuous AUC/MIC ratio was marginally significant (p = 0.1130); a pt was 5.1% more likely to have successful response for every one-unit increase in AUC/MIC.

It was found that cumulative CH 4 fluxes were marginally significant positively correlated with the changes in average NH 4 + -N ( P = 0.114, df = 49; Figure S3A ) and NO 3 – -N content ( P= 0.077, df = 49; Figure S3B ), as well as AGB ( P= 0.074, df = 49; Figure S3C ).