In the subpopulation with baseline 24-h SBP ≥155 mmHg, the pooled effect of RDN was marginally significant (MD = −2.92 mmHg; 95% CI : −6.36–0.53 mmHg; P = 0.10).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
in the Swabian Alp), while root increment showed initially an inconsistent pattern (as indicated by the marginally significant treatment × exploratory-interaction in Table 3 ; Fig. 2 left; F 2, 82 = 2.82, P < 0.1).
Differences were considered statistically significant when P <0.05 and marginally significant when P< 0.10.
*** P < 0.005, ** P < 0.01, * P < 0.05, ms P marginally significant after multiple test correction ( P < 0.1), ns P not significant after multiple test correction.
We also find some evidence that male teachers are more likely to interact with colleagues when experiencing heightened symptoms, although this association is marginally significant at p<0.1 level as shown in figure 4 .
With a marginally significant association, lifetime psychiatric disorder was more common among boys than girls ( p = 0.1).
Differences were considered as statistically significant with P ≤ 0.05 and as marginally significant with P ≤ 0.1.
exotic ( P = 0.016) and target region ( P = 0.072) were significant, or marginally significant ( P < 0.10), effects.
A linear regression with random effects with RT as the dependent variable shows a marginally significant effect of SVO ( B = −0.58, 95% CI [−1.27 to 0.11], P value = 0.1), and a significant effect of trial number ( B = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.011 to −0.0091], P value < 0.001, Wald χ 2 = 413.20).
For all linear mixed-effect models, we performed backwards step-wise model simplification using likelihood ratio tests to obtain the minimum adequate model containing only significant terms (whereby we retained marginally significant effects, i.e., P < 0.1).
The interaction terms indicate that neither precipitation nor temperature effects vary significantly by age according to conventional thresholds of statistical significance (the age-by-temperature interaction term is marginally significant at p < 0.10).
3d ), and the relationship between available N-P slope and MAT was marginally significant (R 2 = 0.50, P = 0.10, Fig. 3b ), implying a decoupling of soil available N and P with increasing MAT.
This analysis revealed a significant or marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.10) interaction between microbial inoculation, herbivory, and herbivory time specifically for the GLVs hexanal ( P = 0.08, F = 2.604) and ( Z )‐3‐hexenyl acetate ( P = 0.09, F = 2.53) (Table S7 ).
Multivariate Cox regression models were explored including ICI type and other covariates presenting a significant or a marginally significant effect ( p -value < 0.1) based on univariate Cox regression models.
All statistically marginally significant prognostic factors which identified by univariate analysis ( P < 0.1) were entered into a Cox proportion hazards regression model with forward stepwise (Likelihood ratio) to identify independent predictors of VAP event.
(2018) , who found leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf δ 13 C and leaf N per area positively correlated to rainfall during the dry seasons ( i.e ., negatively to dry season intensity) of the place of origin of the clones, and marginally significant ( p < 0.1) correlations with wood traits.
We additionally report areas found to be marginally significant (p<0.10), as these areas may be informative to underlying white matter microstructural changes in PD in a larger sample.
For physiological traits, there were no statistically significant effects of ploidy level, however there were marginally significant ( F = 2.856 (1,91), p < 0.1) effects of ploidy level for F s .
Then, those factors showing at least a marginally significant correlation ( P < 0.1) were screened out to construct a Multivariable logistic regression model.
[ 33 ] found a positive association (reported by authors as marginally significant at p < 0.10) between exposure to post hurricane-related (Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005) stressors and increased AU in individuals with a history of low income (estimate = 58.41, standard error (SE) = 31.45), but not among individuals with a history of middle income.
Coercive mobility is marginally significant at p < 0.10.
Predictors were retained when marginally significant ( p < 0.1), in case the significance changed in final, more complete models.
The difference in FEV 1 /FVC decline was marginally significant (−0.001 units/year; 95% CI, −0.003 to 2.77 × 10 −4 ; P = .101).
The uniform distribution was found to be marginally significant ( X 2 (4) = 8.069, P = 0.101), and the median rating score for this question was significantly lower than 3 (V = 52, P = 0.013), showing that in most cases, the VR 3D model did not cause the surgeons to revise their decision as to the selected perforator.
However, only the total monetary productivity gains of the ETN25+MTX group compared with the placebo group were marginally significant (p=0.101).