“marginally significant”

Facial EMG Zygomaticus reactivity The first model assessing the objective outcomes (see Figure 2 A) yielded a marginally significant main effect, χ 2 (2) = 4.45, p = .1, which was driven by losses ( M = 12.34%, SD = 40.65%) significantly increasing zygomaticus reactivity compared to null outcomes ( M = 1.79%, SD = 4.99%), b = 10.55%, t (88) = 2.11, p < .05.

Small-worldness σ was widely reduced in AP within EC gamma, EC alpha, and EO alpha with significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) group differences across one or two thresholds each (Fig. 1 ).

When the effect was either marginally significant (0.05 < p -value < 0.1) or significant ( p -value < 0.05), multiple means comparison was completed using Fisher’s LSD at the 5% level of significance, and letter groupings were generated.

Of the 30 interaction terms we tested, five reached the level of statistical significance (P < 0.05) with an additional three marginally significant (P < 0.10) ( Table 2 ).

Effect modification assessment To evaluate potential effect modification, the following steps were implemented: (1) Subgroup variable selection: Covariates were considered if they showed statistically significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant ( p < 0.10) interaction terms in preliminary fully adjusted models, or if theoretically relevant (e.g., physical activity due to its neurobiological links to depression resilience).

Variables that were at least marginally significant ( p < .10) at the bivariate level were included in each model.

The Cox-proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate survival analysis with adjustments for variables that were significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 ≤ P < 0.10) prognostic factors according to the univariate analysis.

The overall depressive symptom homophily was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), indicating that the likelihood of a confidant relational tie between two community-dwelling older adults was decreased by 5%, with one point increase in their difference in the total number of depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90–1).

However, reductions in sexual IPV and severe physical/sexual IPV at endline among the women with disabilities had point estimates identical to those for women without disabilities, and remained marginally significant at the p<0.10 level.

Model 3 included both IF-based social capital and CS-based social capital and all covariates which were marginally significant ( p < 0.1) in the respective univariate analysis.

Fourth, the effect of timely communication on source inclusion is found to be only significant in the case of the public ( β = .39, p < .001) and marginally significant for news agencies ( β = .15, p < .10).

However, this trend was marginally significant in the association between civic dispositions and civic purpose ( β = 0.053, SE = 0.030, p < 0.10, 95% bootstrap CI [–0.007, 0.109]). 5 Discussion This study contributes to emerging scholarship at the intersection of civic education and sustainability by highlighting moral self‐concept as a critical developmental construct that links civic competencies to a deeper, more enduring sense of civic purpose.

Interestingly, a marginally significant interaction effect was observed between taste and hygiene ratings [ F (1 , 18) = 4.09, p < 0.1, η 2 = 0.19] (see Figure 3B ).

The coefficient for the interaction term of active mediation and supportive profile was marginally significant ( b = −0.119, p < 0.1), indicating that the association between active mediation and leisure-related use within supportive parenting was different from that within slightly-involved parenting profile.

Seven SNPs in six genes ( CDH23 rs2394795, FAS rs1468063 and rs2862833, GJB2 rs3751385, HOTAIR rs87494, SIK3 rs6589574, STAT3 rs1053005) were found to be significantly different between two groups under at least one genetic model ( p < 0.05; Supplementary Table 3 ), and eight SNPs in seven genes ( FOXO3 rs2802292 and rs10457180, GAPDH rs6489721, HDAC2 rs10499080, hOGG1 rs1052133, PTPRN2 rs10081191, STAT3 rs1053023 and TAB2 rs521845) were marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.10; Supplementary Table 3 ).

AGC 74.7, p = 0.0674) was marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the best/worst difference in surgeon 2 ( p = 0.3960) was not significant.

2I ), and was marginally significant for the occipital region ( P = 0.10).

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the significant and marginally significant predictors ( P < 0.10) in the univariate model revealed that the independent predictors of death in the elderly patients were prior history of MI, low eGFR, and poor LVEF in the elderly patients undergoing PCI (Table 4 ), whereas those in the non-elderly patients were prior history of PCI, higher glucose level, poor LVEF, and absence of statin treatment (Table 6 ).

ANOVA on these bacterial PCs detected marginally significant tillage ( p < 0.1) and significant CC ( p < 0.01) main effects from PC1, PC2, and PC3 ( Table 4 ; Figure 1 and Figure 2 ). 3.3.2.

Differences between treatments and day (where appropriate) as well as their interaction were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

After adjusting for comorbidities and ADL limitations in the next model, the coefficient for the age difference became negative and was marginally significant (−.07, P < .10).

For diseases, high scores are significant (p < 0.05), and medium scores are marginally significant (p < 0.1).

For multivariate analyses, we adjusted for marginally significant ( p < 0.1) univariate factors as shown in Additional file 4 .

We only report main effects and interactions involving the three experimental factors and only if the simple effects in follow-up analyses were at least marginally significant ( p < .1).

A simple linear regression analysis showed marginally significant (control, 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1, Figure 4 A, Table 2 ) or significant (+25%, +50%, +75%, and +100% water addition treatment, all p ≤ 0.05, Figure 4 B–E, Table 2 ) downward quadratic correlations between OSR and the summer mean temperature (T sum ).