“marginally significant”

hyaena (p = 0.062, p = 0.102, respectively) identify marginally significant differences in dietary behavior (all p-values ≤ 0.10).

Only variables that were marginally significant ( p < .1) in the univariate analysis were included as independent variables in the multiple linear regression analysis.

Health insurance shows a weakly positive association with inpatient utilization, with Employee Medical Insurance being marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Plan choice has a marginally significant effect on receipt of speech therapy, yet the effects are only significant for non-users and frequent users ( p <0.10).

First generation immigrants irrespective of region showed an increased likelihood of cumulative exclusion that was marginally significant ( b = .06 (.04), p < .10 and b = .06 (.03), p < .06, for the European and non-European regions, respectively).

A marginally significant negative correlation was found between C1-INH activity levels and severity scores ( p = 0.1, r = –0.515).

3d ), and the relationship between available N-P slope and MAT was marginally significant (R 2 = 0.50, P = 0.10, Fig. 3b ), implying a decoupling of soil available N and P with increasing MAT.

Additionally, in the heating season, the GMs of BbFA, BkFA, BaP, DahA, and Σ10-PAHs in school B were higher than those in school A by 38%, 47%, 26%, 26%, and 39%, respectively ( P < 0.05), with a marginally significant difference between schools for FLA, CHR, BaA, DghiP, and IcdP ( P < 0.10).

For all statistical tests, we considered differences to be significant at P ≤0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05< P ≤0.10.

The DB condition also showed a marginally significant increase compared with the cage control condition (multiple comparison test with Bonferroni correction, P< 0.1).

Potential predictors are defined as variables with a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome variable.

Physical function and physical composite were marginally significant (p<0.10).

Results We report here the significant ( p < 0.05) or marginally significant (0.05 < p < 0.1) findings which were the focus of the study.

Tests were considered statistically significant when P<0.05 and marginally significant when 0.05<P<0.1.

However, multiple other 5′ tRNA halves and 5′ YRNA fragments belonged to modules (i.e., Black, Brown, GreenYellow, and Turquoise) that displayed marginally significant trends (0.05 < P < 0.1) with the cancer trait ( Figure 2B , Supplementary Figures 1 , 2 ). 5′ tRNA-Val-CAC-2-1 Half Is Part of a Key miRNA-Enriched Regulatory Coexpression Module That Targets Genes Involved in the Negative Regulation of the G1/S Transition of the Mitotic Cell Cycle As commented above, we reasoned that miRNAs and 5′ tRNA halves and/or 5′ YRNA fragments that are coregulated and involved in common biological pathways will belong to common coexpression modules detected by the WGCNA method.

The indirect relationship is marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the significant and marginally significant predictors ( P < 0.10) in the univariate model revealed that the independent predictors of death in the elderly patients were prior history of MI, low eGFR, and poor LVEF in the elderly patients undergoing PCI (Table 4 ), whereas those in the non-elderly patients were prior history of PCI, higher glucose level, poor LVEF, and absence of statin treatment (Table 6 ).

All the solid lines and dotted lines represent significant ( P < 0.05) and marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1, n = 32) linear regression.

For instance, higher levels of structural–associational solidarity were associated with a slightly higher probability of expecting filial care at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1).

Despite limited power, sensitivity analyses restricting the comparison group to participants with a history of no infections (for example, influenza versus no history of any infection) showed consistent atrophy linked to influenza, herpes viruses, miscellaneous viral infections and LRTIs, with URTI- and skin and subcutaneous infection-related atrophy remaining marginally significant ( P ≤ 0.10) ( Supplementary Table 4 ).

The figure and results reported in Table 4 indicate that six of the 19 individual measures evaluated in this study yield a statistically significant relationship at conventional levels with countries’ decisions to issue SAHOs (note that temporal diffusion is statistically significant, but the change in probability is small and not discernible on this figure), and two yield marginally significant relationships (p < 0.10).

Significance was set at p < 0.05, but we also noted marginally significant associations at p < 0.10, given the exploratory nature of the analysis.

Variables significantly associated with the outcome and those that were marginally significant ( p < .10) in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.

However, the estimate is not statistically significant for the number of days not in good mental health and marginally significant ( P < .1) for frequent mental distress in 2021.

(e) There was marginally significant difference of CD44T expression according to N factors (p = 0.10), and CD44T expression was rather reduced in N2 factor.