However, comparisons of ΔAIC and R 2 indicated that the simpler MAM containing a linear size effect had substantially greater support than the MAM including a marginally significant non-linear response of basal area growth with tree size (DBH 2 : L = 2.71, P = 0.10; ΔAIC for the MAM with a non-linear size effect was only 0.7 points lower than for the model with a linear size effect; Table 2 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
As illustrated in Model 6 of Table 4 , of the three goal orientations, only team learning-goal orientation had a marginally significant relationship with boundary buffering (γ = 0.60, p < 0.10), failing to support Hypotheses 5a, 5b, and 5c.
However, in our current study, intrinsic motivation did not emerge as a significant predictor of quality of life in breast cancer patients at the traditional alpha level of p < 0.05 (although it could be considered to be marginally significant at the less conservative level of p < 0.10).
2I ), and was marginally significant for the occipital region ( P = 0.10).
Path analysis employing the structural equations method As shown in Tables 3 and 4 , the Chi-squared tests show that the rGE correlation between carrying ADRB2 minor alleles and negative emotion cannot be ruled out (the estimates are marginally significant, p <0.1).
Significant associations were determined with a p value of <0.001, <0.05, and marginally significant associations were determined with a p value of <0.1.
Overall, the variable ADHD or not predicted only 1of 14 outcomes in this study (marginally significant); children with an ADHD diagnosis were rated by their parents to score lower on social skills, F (1, 214) = 2.69, p < .10, after PMTO treatment (Table 1 ).
Further, significant Pixels (β = 0.63, p < 0.001), AR (β = 0.67, p < 0.001) and Complexity (β = −0.47, p < 0.01) effects were found on reaction time for the forward condition at the superordinate level, while marginally significant effects were found for Slant (β = −0.29, p < 0.1) and DC (β = 0.35, p < 0.1).
Individual paths were estimated using maximum likelihood and we considered paths to be significant at P < 0.05 and marginally significant at P < 0.10 ( Hurlbert and Lombardi, 2009 ).
The effect of the achievement goal condition was however marginally significant ( B = −0.75; p < 0.10), and the interaction between the motive to avoid failure and the achievement goal condition was significantly related to emotionality during problem-solving ( B = 0.10; p < 0.05).
Data analysis was conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; Cary, NC, USA), with two-tailed significance of p < 0.05, and marginally significant 0.05 < p < 0.1.
Only pairs with a significant ( P < 0.05) or marginally significant ( P < 0.1) difference are shown.
Variables that were marginally significant (p<0.10) in the univariate analyses were selected as covariates for subsequent multivariate analysis.
For the correlations of inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus activation with memory loss marginally significant differences between groups in height of correlation were observed (( z = 1.47 and z = 1.34 p <0.10, one-tailed).
Thus, the correlation is significant and marginally significant (i.e. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) at these two site.
The term for the interaction between Internet use status and gender was marginally significant (β = −0.937, p < 0.1), indicating that the depressive-symptom-reducing effect of Internet use status was approximately one CES-D point greater for left-behind older men than for left-behind older women.
On the between-level, EE is positively related to trait EL, but not to (aggregated) state EL (only having a marginally significant relationship, p < 0.10).
At average levels of baseline self-compassion, participants demonstrated a marginally significant decrease from pre- to post-intervention in depression ( B = −0.02, p = 0.10).
This has a number of implications including risk of biased overestimation of explained variation (which we accounted for by reporting an adjusted R 2 value) and risk of overfitting of models (as a result of which we dropped several marginally significant (0.05<P<0.1) variables from final models, and our fitted model has at least 10 practices per variable which is adequate in view of simulation studies showing that a minimum of only two SPV may suffice in linear regression for adequate estimation of regression coefficients). 24 More problematically, there is relatively limited power for identifying practice characteristics significantly associated with trial participation, and for examining variation in intervention implementation and outcomes.
Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at P ≤ 0.10.
The threshold of significance was p < 0.05, but marginally significant effects ( p < 0.1) were also reported.
The results showed that the indirect effects were similar to the full multimorbidity variable when eight of the conditions were individually removed from the index. The exception was hypertension: the indirect effect for the multimorbidity variable that did not include hypertension was smaller and statistically marginally significant ( p < 0.10).
When further adjusted for gynecology-related factors (Model 3), the association between moderate/severe dysmenorrhea and a higher level of psychological distress was marginally significant (β = 1.548, p < 0.10), and moderate/severe psychological symptoms of PMS were significantly associated with a higher level of psychological distress (β = 3.978, p < 0.001).
For children up to 10 years, IgG OD responses increased significantly (p<0.05) with age for spike, while IgA OD responses to spike and RBD presented a marginally significant (p<0.1) increase with age ( Fig 2F ).
However, this is only significant for South Africa (CI = − 0.0573; p < 0.05), and marginally significant for Zambia (CI = − 0.0341; P < 0.1) and Zimbabwe (CI = − 0.0357; p < 0.1).