“marginally significant”

Results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant (tendency) at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

Finally, explanatory variables found to be marginally significant (p<0.10) in bivariate analyses were tested in multivariable linear regression Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models with cluster-robust SEs to account for clustering.

In contrast, the effect of CACS-2 was statistically insignificant ( b = 0.027, p > 0.1), and CACS-8 exhibited only a marginally significant, weak effect ( b = 0.184, p < 0.1).

No CMF consumption showed a marginally significant association with CMS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.89–3.36, p = 0.10).

(2018) find that left-hand 2D:4D is statistically significantly negatively related to men’s self-employment ( p < .01), whereas for women they report a “marginally significant” negative relation ( p < .10).

While the association in the unadjusted model (Model 1) was marginally significant for the continuous variable (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.97–1.52; P = 0.100), it became statistically significant in Model 2 (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.03–1.67; P = 0.028) and reached its strongest significance in the fully adjusted Model 3 (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.14–2.04; P = 0.005).

5d,g,h ), with TSSp::FRO6–GFP allele 1 significantly different ( P < 0.05) and allele 2 marginally significant (0.05 < P < 0.1).

Unadjusted HR-pQCT Parameters by KLG In the unadjusted bar plots of sex-specific standardized distal tibia HR-pQCT parameters in men, higher KLG was correlated with lower Ct.vBMD, higher Tt.Area and higher Tb.Area with a marginally significant p-value for linear trend ( p ≤ 0.10; Fig. 2 Standardized distal tibia HR-pQCT parameters by Kellgren–Lawrence grade in men).

For confounding factors that showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05) or marginally significant differences (0.05≤P<0.1) in association with both RGV and sleep disturbance and might interfere with the primary study results, the present study performed adjustments using a multivariate logistic regression model designed to identify independent predictors of postoperative sleep disturbance.

However, this trend was marginally significant in the association between civic dispositions and civic purpose ( β = 0.053, SE = 0.030, p < 0.10, 95% bootstrap CI [–0.007, 0.109]). 5 Discussion This study contributes to emerging scholarship at the intersection of civic education and sustainability by highlighting moral self‐concept as a critical developmental construct that links civic competencies to a deeper, more enduring sense of civic purpose.

While caregivers’ preferences had a marginally significant association with patients’ actual place of death ( p -value < 0.10), we did not find any association between patients’ preferred and actual place of death.

In contrast, the T-test for autonomy indicated only a marginally significant effect (one-tailed p < 0.1).

The mental health benefits of suburban green spaces became evident, showing marginally significant depression-reducing effects among the older adults ( B = −0.113, p < 0.1), groups with medium economic status ( B = −0.101, p < 0.05), and those with lower education levels ( B = −0.073, p < 0.1).

Regarding overall non-farm labor time, column (1) shows that the coefficient for the logarithm of the assistance amount in youth households is marginally significant at the 10% level ( β = 0.972, p < 0.1), while the coefficients for middle-aged and older adult households do not pass the significance test.

In contrast, several variables showed marginally significant trends (0.05 < P < 0.10): soil pH ( P = 0.071; Figure 3b ), non-photochemical quenching ( P = 0.082; Figure 3e ), legume abundance ( P = 0.077; Figure 3i ), and species richness ( P = 0.082; Figure 3m ) all exhibited slight non-linear trajectories.

Results were considered significant with P ≤ 0.05 and were considered marginally significant with P ≤ 0.10.

late), stimulation intensity (three levels), and interval (five levels) as within-subject factors revealed only a marginally significant first-order interaction between phase and interval (p < 0.1).

When smoking status and obesity were added (Model 6), the main effect of educational resources at 12 years of schooling remained negative and marginally significant (b = −0.017, 95% CI: −0.035, 0.002; p < 0.10), while the interaction term was attenuated and no longer statistically significant (b = −0.003, 95% CI: −0.008, 0.001). 3.2.5 Predicted differences across educational attainment levels Fig. 2 translates Models 5-6 into predicted differences in inflammation when comparing individuals educated in states at the 90th versus 10th percentile of educational resources, across levels of educational attainment (8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 years).

Fourth, given the exploratory nature of cross-national comparisons and the potential loss of statistical power arising from the differences in variable construction discussed above, we retain the reporting of marginally significant associations (p < 0.10) but clearly distinguish them from statistically significant results using the † symbol throughout.

Health insurance shows a weakly positive association with inpatient utilization, with Employee Medical Insurance being marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

The interaction term was marginally significant for paternal support (p = .10) and significant for maternal, sibling and peer support (p < .05).

There was a statistically significant dose response in the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) S-phase labeling index (LI) in the DEN-initiated rats (p < 0.01) and a marginally significant trend in the saline-treated rats (p = 0.10), but proliferating cell nuclear antigen S-phase LI and growth fraction within altered hepatic foci showed no increase.

The mother's breast milk 207Pb/206Pb ratio was found to be a marginally significant predictor of an infant's blood 06Pb/204Pb ratio at p<0.1; however, breast milk lead concentration was not found to be statistically significant at this level.

Coefficient estimates for the model revealed a significant association with baseline negative affect ( p < .001) and a marginally significant association of drinks/week ( p = .10).

When the interaction term was "marginally significant" (i.e., 0.05 < P < 0.10), changes from day 0 to day 84 within treatment groups were assessed with a paired t-test.