“marginally significant”

After adjustment, drive-time effects attenuated substantially, with only the 21–30 min category remaining marginally significant (− 0.30 pp, p < 0.10), while the 31–45 min and > 45 min categories were no longer significant.

We found that at all stages the protein interaction pairs' absolute Pearson correlation coefficients were larger than the total control at a significant level ( p < 0.001 for N, C, and D) or marginally significant level ( p < 0.1, for E and A).

0.39) was marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Potential predictors are defined as variables with at least a marginally significant association (p<0.10) with the outcome.

On the between-level, EE is positively related to trait EL, but not to (aggregated) state EL (only having a marginally significant relationship, p < 0.10).

While most of the interaction terms in Model 4 were not statistically significant, their presence in the model rendered the beta for days of rationing marginally significant ( p <0.10) and proportion of vegetated land cover statistically significant ( p <0.01), thus lending initial, though weak, support to hypothesis 2 that increased rationing was associated with increased sachet use.

Results of our sensitivity analysis were similar for overall and individual gatekeeper behaviors except for questioning, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.10).

Thus, the correlation is significant and marginally significant (i.e. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) at these two site.

The results showed a significant effect of Attention Switching in conversations about present intention (β = −0.41, p < 0.05), and a marginally significant effect of Communication in conversations about past experience (β = 0.35, p < 0.1). 3.3 Event-related spectral perturbation In the same way with the ERP analysis, ERSPs were analyzed using the STUDY command structure in EEGLAB.

Tumor Perfusion Changes Mean blood flow and volume declined significantly ( P < .05) between baseline and the first recheck for the whole tumor and was marginally significant for the tumor center ( P < .1) based on raw P value although none were significant after adjusting for multiple testing (FDR <0.05) (Table 1 ).

There were marginally significant 3-way interactions among the WMH quintiles, stroke subtypes, and stroke severity ( p = 0.10).

Aside from one coefficient, marginally significant at the (p<0.1) level, there appears to be no systematic response to children victims.

In each case, the statistically significant ( p < 0.05) associations reported in Table 3 remained significant or became marginally significant ( p < 0.1 for two models including income), and nearly all model estimates in the T1I1 group changed by < 10%.

CO only showed marginally significant associations with PAI-1 at 3-d to 6-d moving averages ( p <0.10).

Statistical analysis Multiple logistic regression models were fit for the three dependent variables (i.e., suicidality, poor general mental health and significant depressive symptoms), adjusted for background variables that were significant or marginally significant in univariate analysis ( p < 0.1).

Differences between treatments were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

For the correlations of inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus activation with memory loss marginally significant differences between groups in height of correlation were observed (( z = 1.47 and z = 1.34 p <0.10, one-tailed).

All results with α < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant; marginally significant results ( p < 0.1; i.e., α < 0.10) are also mentioned.

FC Analysis of within-region FC revealed a significant time by group interaction for the right dlPFC (F (1,43) = 8.552, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.16) and a marginally significant interaction in the right IFG (F (1,43) = 6.34, p < 0.1, η2 = 0.13).

A multivariable linear regression model will be used to assess the significance of treatment for each group while adjusting for baseline variables that are at least marginally significant univariately (p < 0.10) and other variables that are selected a-priori for clinical significance (e.g. age).

In a comparison of all three TOP/culture categories from Table 1 , multivariate results revealed that age (p = 0.02) and gender (p<0.001) were statistically significant and previous TB treatment was marginally significant (p = 0.10).

The cells marked with “a” mean significant relationships ( p < 0.05) and cells marked with “b” mean marginally significant relationships (0.05 < p < 0.1).

Since this was a pilot or proof-of-concept study, statistically significant treatment differences were declared if the probability of random occurrence among or between the treatment groups, p , was ≤ 0.05, and treatment differences were declared marginally significant if 0.05 < p ≤ 0.10.

Third, we find the fewest statistically significant relationships between HIV/AIDS outcomes and the likelihood of COVID infection, and most of the very few associations are marginally significant (p<0.10).

We report statistically significant results as p < 0.05 and marginally significant results as 0.05 < p < 0.10.