“marginally significant”

The Angelus fiber group displayed a marginally significant difference compared to the conventional composite group ( P = 0.098).

The estimated abundance of red-listed beetles in natural dead wood differed among forest types (Quade Test Statistic: 5.639, p = 0.013) and was higher in reserves than in clear-cuts (marginally significant) and mature managed forests (Quade Multiple Comparisons, p = 0.098, p = 0.004, respectively).

There was a marginally significant interaction between Group and Partner ( F (1, 84) = 2.81, p = 0.098) such that response to Peer messages in the TD group was stronger than response to Peer messages in the AUT group and Computer messages in both groups.

Trends of HAIs From 2012 to 2023, the overall hospital-wide prevalence of HAIs showed no significant trend, but differences were notable: surgical wards had a significant upward trend from 3.97% (95% CI 2.65–5.68%) in 2012 to 4.82% (95% CI 3.48–6.49%) in 2023 ( β = 0.135, P = 0.003), while ICUs and non-surgical wards showed marginally significant downward trends ( β = − 2.360, P = 0.098; β = − 0.128, P = 0.071) (Fig. 1 A).

However, postoperative NPS was considered marginally significant as a prognostic factor for OS ( p = 0.098). 3.7.

A main effect of neuroticism scores was marginally significant (F(1,18) = 3.04, p = 0.098) for fear ratings, resulting from fear ratings being higher in participants with higher neuroticism scores.

Notably, a marginally significant negative correlation was found between HRQoL and the HEN programs’ duration (β: −0.19, 95% CI −0.40–0.03, p = 0.098), as the HRQoL score seems to decrease by 0.19 points for each year spent on HEN.

Another SNP that was also considered in the GRS due to its marginally significant P value ( P = 0.098) was rs4784227.

Anxiety also correlated marginally significant with cannabis use quantity ( r (358) = 0.09, p = 0.098).

3.1.2 Arousal The main effect of modality was marginally significant ( F (1,85) = 2.79, p = 0.0987), suggesting a potential trend toward higher arousal in the MV condition (Δ (Post‐Pre Mean) = 0.389) compared to the M condition (Δ (Post‐Pre Mean) = −0.148).

An ANOVA analysis revealed that the interaction between ISI and Confidence was marginally significant (F 3, 83 = 2.16, P = 0.0987), while the main effect of ISI was not significant (F 1, 0.92 = 0.96, P = 0.52).

Conversely, for time spent looking elsewhere and off task (Q4), we found a significant negative effect on learning ( B = −6.96, p = .004), and likewise but marginally significant for looking at materials, but mind wandering (Q3) ( B = −9.42, p = .0989)(see Figures 4c and 4d respectively).

A marginally significant association between total flavonoid intake and reduced CVD mortality was found (summary RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70–1.03; p = 0.099) [ 80 ].

The residence of caregivers, whether rural or urban, displayed a marginally significant association with depression (χ 2 (1)= 2.721, p = 0.099).

The differences for purpose in life were marginally significant ( F = 2.78, p = 0.099), showing a slight increase in the experimental group. 3.2.

Importantly, the group-by-condition interaction was marginally significant [ F (2, 76) = 2.40, p = .099, η2 p = .06].

There was a marginally significant interaction effect in the left vlPFC, F (1, 33) = 2.88, p = .099, η p 2 = .080.

FMD was no longer a significant predictor for nighttime SBP (β=−1.28, p = .26) after controlling for MSNA burst incidence as a mediator and age and BMI as covariates, while FMD remained marginally significant after controlling for MSNA burst frequency, age, and BMI as mediators (β=−2.10, p = .099).

The same lagged effect in Model II showed a positive linear trend that was marginally significant (rACC = >LA: LT(RE...R3), t (13) = 1.776, P <0.099).

Between-group differences in these correlation coefficients were statistically significant for anhedonia ( Z = −3.67, p < 0.001) and marginally significant for resilience ( Z = −1.29, p = 0.099).

Similar results were observed for PM 2.5 (highest versus lowest tertile: aOR = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.02–3.13), whereas the result for PM 10 was marginally significant (highest versus lowest tertile: aOR = 1.57 (95% CI: 0.92–2.69; p = 0.099).

Under these conditions we found that lumacaftor significantly reduces THP-1 phagocytosis (p < 0.01), and a marginally significant trend (p = 0.099) suggesting that ivacaftor may also reduce phagocytosis.

When considering other clinical factors, including subtype information, the results of multivariate cox regression analysis showed that hsa-miR-29c exhibited significant association with patient survival in TCGA (hazard ratio (HR)=4.31, 95% confidence interval (CI)=(1.94, 9.60), P =3.49 × 10 −4 , Table 4 ) and the GSE22220 (HR=1.91, 95% CI=(1.04, 3.50), P =0.038, Table 4 ) data set, and was marginally significant in GSE19536 (HR=4.02, 95% CI=(0.77, 21.02), P =0.099, Table 4 ).

The quality of roof material showed a marginally significant negative association with anemia levels ( β = −0.002, SE = 0.001, CR = −1.649, p = 0.099), suggesting that better roofing may be linked to lower anemia levels.

Early Time Window The results of repeated‐measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant main effect of condition ( F (2, 122) = 5.32, p < 0.01, η 2 = 0.080), whereby the main effect of group was found to be marginally significant ( F (1, 61) = 2.80, p = 0.099).