“marginally significant”

For the Orbicularis Oculi muscle we found a significant effect of Time ( F (1,30) = 24.378, p <.001, η p 2 = .45) due to higher EMG activation in the second time window; a trend-like main effect of AU25&26 ( F (2,60) = 2.65, p = .079, η p 2 = .08), and two marginally significant interactions for AU12 X AU6 X AU25&26 (F(4,120) = 2.03, p = .095, η p 2 = .06), and AU12 X Time ( F (1,30) = 3.39, p = .075, η p 2 = .1).

The effect of Number of pairs was marginally significant, F (2, 138) = 2.38, p = 0.095, η 2 = 0.03, (two pairs, M = 0.40; SD = 0.26; three, M = 0.47; SD = 0.21; four, M = 0.37; SD = 0.20), and the Distance * Number of pairs interaction effect was not significant, F (2, 138) = 0.006.

However, a marginally significant association between high CHOP expression and ATF3 expression was observed ( p = 0.095) (Table 2 ).

As shown in Table 3 , the PSA level in the diabetics was slightly lower than that in the non-diabetics, and this difference was marginally significant after adjusting for age and BMI (1.05 vs. 1.14; p = 0.095).

It became marginally significant when demographic variables were not controlled for ( p = 0.095).

Moreover, we found a positive and marginally significant correlation between the target of boundary management and the boundary management–team performance effect sizes ( r = .12, p = .095), with this positive relationship being slightly more pronounced for extraorganizational targets (ρ = 0.40, 95% CI [0.29, 0.51]) than intraorganizational targets (ρ = 0.34, 95% CI [0.27, 0.41]).

However, the risk of soft tissue disorders such as tendon injuries was marginally significant (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97–1.49; p = 0.095).

Physical leisure activities in Model 1c-3 presented a marginally significant association between monthly exercise and cognitive functioning at T2 (B = 0.19, p = 0.095).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between time and test, exhibiting a medium effect after the Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied (F = 2.659, p = 0.095, partial η2 = 0.081, medium effect).

Moreover, FOXM1 expression in tumor cells was found to be obviously associated with pT status ( P = 0.014) and marginally significant with pM status ( P = 0.095, Table 2 ).

There was a weak, marginally significant positive effect of invasion on B. americanum abundance ( p = 0.095; Appendix S1 : Table S1 , Figure S5 ).

Illicit drug use (DAST-10) was more common in the problem gamblers than controls (χ 2 = 6.46, df 1, P = 0.011), with a marginally significant difference between the alcohol-dependent group and controls (χ 2 = 2.79, df 1, P = 0.095).

Despite the smaller sample size the confidence effect was still marginally significant in this between-subject analysis, F(1, 120) = 2.85, p<.095, η 2 p = .02.

The random effect likelihood ratio test for the pair random intercept was marginally significant ( p = 0.095), with ICC of 0.471.

In the 400- to 600-ms time window, the three-way interaction of prime-target relatedness, type of relatedness and anteriority was significant ( F (1,29) = 6.67, p = 0.015), and the three-way interaction of prime-target relatedness, anteriority and laterality was marginally significant ( F (2,58) = 2.45, p = 0.095).

There was also a small, marginally significant positive correlation between BI and perceived negative interactions with peers ( r = .16, p = .095).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant main effect of group on RT, F (1,36) = 2.943, p = 0.095, partial η 2 = 0.076, with post-hoc tests showing that the RT of music trainees was longer than that of non-music trainees.

This group difference for detail-based viewing in the relational condition remained marginally significant after adjusting for age and gender, F (1, 34) = 2.96, p = 0.095, η p 2 = 0.080. 3.2.2.2.1.

Furthermore, the three-way interaction of Group × Correctness × Condition was marginally significant [ F (1,30) = 2.97, p = 0.095, η p 2 = 0.09].

Like Study 1, American cultural priming also led to a higher dialectical self‐concept than neutral priming, but it was marginally significant, M = 4.75; SD = 0.57, t (269) = 2.09, p = .095, d = 0.314, 95% CI [−0.041, 0.669].

Finally, a marginally significant interaction was found between SCHEMA and MEMORY LEVEL ( F (1,47) = 2.91, p = 0.095), suggesting that it might be possible that differences between the schema conditions are somewhat larger for global recognition (mean difference = 0.42, SD = 0.51) than for detailed recognition (mean difference = 0.30, SD = 0.46).

Positive aging perception significantly enhanced gerontechnology confidence (β=.462; P <.001) and comfort (β=.323; P =.047) and exhibited a marginally significant positive relationship with control beliefs (β=.228; P =.095).

More severe patients seem to have the following characteristics: older age; higher frequency with underlying diseases; higher maximum body temperature within 24 hours after hospitalization; longer time for virus clearance (from illness onset to turning negative) and duration of fever (days); higher plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, procalcitonin (PCT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); larger count of white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophil (NE), but relatively reduced lymphocyte count (marginally significant; P = .095); higher NE to lymphocyte ratio (NLR); and higher initial viral load (Ct and log 10 [copies/mL]) (except lymphocyte [ P = .095], all P < .05) ( Table 1 ).

Moreover, the high E 2 group showed a tendency for long naps in the daytime, and the difference was marginally significant ( Figure 5 E, P = 0.095, rank-sum test; and Figure 5 A).

For example, in the fully adjusted model (Model 5), the association between having a college-educated friend and BNP was not statistically significant (β = − 0.16, p = 0.143) and marginally significant for Troponin I (β = − 0.57, p = 0.095).