“marginally significant”

month of measurement, was not statistically significant 1 minute after intake (P = 0.53), but marginally significant 15 minutes after intake (P=0.09).

In contrast, our predictions were met for three genes: We found a significant inter-species difference in gene expression for the genes TAF11 (one-tailed P <0.001) and TXNIP ( P = 0.02), and a marginally significant, consistent difference ( P = 0.09) for RARS ( Figure 3 ).

Notably, interest in monogamous reproductive strategies predicts women’s preferences for men’s faces indicating high levels of agreeableness ( Brown et al., 2019 [though note effect was marginally significant, p = 0.090]), and low levels of extraversion ( Brown & Sacco, 2017 ), masculinity ( Kruger, 2006 ) and narcissism ( Marcinkowska et al., 2015 ).

There was a marginally significant group × word-type interaction, F (1,45) = 3.00, p = 0.090, η 2 = 0.06.

There was a marginally significant main-factor effect of N treatment ( p = 0.09) and no significant N treatment × sample date interaction on P. crenatus population densities when all sample dates were analyzed.

The overall ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of Group ( F (1,32) = 2.79, p = .09, η 2 = .08), with the HMA group showing a greater positivity (e.g., at Cz mean = .80 μV, SEM = .16) than the LMA one (mean = .50 μV, SEM = .10).

PC1 (overall size axis) showed a weaker, marginally significant positive correlation (estimate = 1.355, OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.21–41.62, p = 0.090; Table 6 ).

Relationships between psychological traits and anxiety symptom changes before and after giving birth in non-clinical and clinical groups The main effect of time was marginally significant (b = 5.6, SE = 3.27, t = 1.71, p = 0.09), but its interaction with neuroticism was significant (b = 0.26, SE = 0.09, t = 2,7, p = 0.007), indicating that individuals with higher neuroticism showed stronger changes over time.

As Table 4 shows, we found a significant interaction effect (γ = 0.40, p < 0.01) between the employees’ gender and their WAL to predict their leadership potential rated by their supervisors, whereas employees’ WAL had a marginally significant negative effect (γ = −0.14, p = 0.09), and their gender (0 = woman, 1 = man) had a positive and significant main effect (γ = 0.32, p < 0.01).

This difference was marginally significant in multivariate analysis that controlled for transfusion burden and splenectomy under a dominant model ( p = 0.09) ( Table 2 , Figure 1 a) but not under the other genetic models.

Moreover, a marginally significant three-way interaction was found between type frequency, token frequency, and constituency ( F (1, 29) = 3.05, p = 0.09, ƞ 2 = 0.10), indicating that constituency status (i.e., phrasal vs. non-phrasal) might modulate frequency effects.

Forest significantly affected root %C and was marginally significant for %N ( P = 0.09), %P ( P = 0.08), and C : N ratios ( P = 0.08; Table S2 ).

Last, our study demonstrated a non-statistically but marginally significant improvement in term of ORR (71.4% vs. 51.6%; P = 0.09) or PFS (18.5 vs. 11.7 months; P = 0.07) with the addition of metronomic oral cyclophosphamide.

For the color cue, results showed that the main effect of Age was marginally significant, F (2, 89) = 2.46, p = .09.

There was a marginally significant effect of action-congruency, F (1, 15) = 3.41, p = .09; η 2 = .19; and no significant effect of movement-congruency, F (1, 15) = .02, p = .90; η 2 = .00.

However, there was no difference between positive and negative distractors, p = 0.23, and a marginally significant difference between positive and neutral distractors, p = 0.09.

A marginally significant main effect of age emerged, F (1,56) = 2.95, p = 0.09.

However, we note that the difference in willingness for finger prick between the two groups is marginally significant, p = 0.09, yielding a larger effect size, r = 0.42 than willingness for taking strong medication, r = 0.29.

The interaction between Lag and Task was marginally significant, F (2, 56) = 2.6, MSE = .003, p <.09.

1e ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.22), we observed a marginally significant difference in community-type distribution by CA polyp location (Fig. 1f ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.09) and by CA non-advanced or advanced classification (Fig. 1g ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.08).

In terms of total strain, a marginally significant trend with the main effect of perceived difficulty was observed in December ( p = 0.09).

In multivariate analyses with confounder adjustments, the association of mid-FAS with risk of GDM was marginally significant [adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.08, 95% CI 0.99, 1.17; p = 0.09], whereas its association with lower risks of GHDs (aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74, 0.96) and pre-eclampsia (aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67, 0.97) persisted ( Table 2 ).

Rectal mucosal inflammation was higher in secretions collected at baseline among MSM engaging in RAI compared to controls There was a marginally significant ( p = 0.09) difference in overall cytokine profile across all study visits between the MSM-RAI and control groups with five significantly elevated cytokines in the MSM-RAI group (IL-1β, IL-17A, IP-10, IL-8, and IFN-γ; all p < 0.05 for individual cytokines, Fig. 1 A and Supplementary Table 1 ).

There was also a marginally significant interaction between stimulus contrast and group (F (2.5,84) = 2.4, P = 0.09), reflecting a larger difference between the groups for higher stimulus contrasts than for low stimulus contrasts (Figure 3 D).

When stratified by sex, a significant association between BPA and incident asthma (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.18–2.76; P <.001) and a marginally significant association between BPA and PC 20 (ß = −2.59, P = .09; Table S2 in File S1 ) were observed only in girls.