“marginally significant”

Among individuals with high levels of avoidant coping (+1 SD from the mean), there was a positive, marginally significant trend for an association between discrimination and depression symptoms ( β = 1.44, p = .09).

A 2 (tested, control) X 2 (with-context, without-context) X 2 (neutral item, misled item) ANOVA revealed a marginally significant 3-way interaction, F (1, 116) = 2.95, p = .09, ƞ 2 p = .03.

The presence of KRAS pathogenic variants showed a marginally significant association with TP53 pathogenic variants ( p = 0.090, OR: 2.357, 95% CI: 0.859–6.465).

Effects involving BIF score (chronic level of action identification) The analysis also revealed a marginally significant BIF × distal intent interaction, β = 0.07, t (459) = 1.70, p = 0.09 and significant BIF × distal intent × proximal intent interaction, β = 0.07, t (459) = 1.92, p = 0.05.

Food insecurity scores were lower amongst those with cell phones than those without, though this finding was marginally significant ( p = 0.09).

The main effect of Prime Condition was marginally significant, F (1, 19) = 3.28, P = 0.09, η 2 = 0.15.

Similar to Gershberg and Shimamura ( 1995 ), this analysis revealed a marginally significant effect of Condition [ F (3,28) = 2.39, p = .09] with participants performing significantly better on the Full-cues ( M = .64, SD = .18) than the No-cues ( M = .58, SD = .17) condition ( t = 2.59, df = 31, p < .05), whilst performance on the Encoding-cues ( M = .60, SD = .18) and Retrieval-cues ( M = .60, SD = .19) conditions fell in between.

In V3, we found a marginally significant main effect of attentional window (F(1, 9) = 3.68, p = 0.09) and an interaction between attentional window and TR (F(2, 18) = 4.02, p <0.05, Huynh-Feldt corrected).

In the same direction, marginally significant medium-sized effects of verbal suggestions on skin temperature increase were found in the open-label [ F (1,41) = 3.01, p = .090, Cohen’s d = 0.54] and closed-label groups [ F (1,43) = 2.93, p = .094, Cohen’s d = 0.52], respectively.

For NA, acceleration of evolution after reassortments was significant in 5 out of 6 analyses; in the sixth analysis, it was marginally significant (p = 0.09).

The odds of publicly owned group practices having urology practice availability compared to privately owned group practices was substantial (6.33) and marginally significant (p = 0.09).

AbDv was smaller in the Practice Group (2057.34±249.07) compared with the No-Practice Group (2903.38±207.24) (p<.05) and it showed a tendency to decrease between day of pre- and post-test which was marginally significant (3575.16±297.21 to 1385.56±95.98) (p = .09).

When order was added to the model, there was only a marginally significant finding between video condition and post-peak decline in oxytocin, b = 0.005, SE = 0.003, p = 0.09.

Next, the within factor showed a significant effect for the family role ( F (1,63) = 21.95, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.26) and a marginally significant effect for the family role and group membership interaction ( F (1,63) = 2.48, p = 0.09, η 2 = 0.04).

In partial support of H5, when punishment was the outcome variable, the overall model was marginally significant, R 2 = .20, F (2,32) = 2.60, p = .09.

In any case, our data indicate that with exception of the VIQ, the active duration of the disease had a marginally significant effect on both the FSIQ (p = 0.09) and the PIQ (p = 0.08), with longer active duration being associated with lower scores, as already emerged in previous research [ 24 ].

Permutation tests comparing TAFs and TLFs showed that of the six interaction attributes tested, only nestedness and centralization betweenness showed marginally significant differences between TAFs and TLFs ( p = 0.090 and 0.088, respectively; Table S8 ). 3.3.

Over the course of the glucose tolerance test, blood glucose concentrations exhibited a marginally significant interaction between time and treatment (F(20,72) = 1.5, p = 0.09), with MIX dams showing a significantly elevated glucose area under the curve compared to vehicle dams ( p = 0.033, Cohen’s d = 1.63, Figure 1 C).

1e ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.22), we observed a marginally significant difference in community-type distribution by CA polyp location (Fig. 1f ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.09) and by CA non-advanced or advanced classification (Fig. 1g ; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.08).

This change was marginally significant between α 1C and α 1C /β 2a /α 2 δ cells (at a level P < 0.09) and not significant between α 1C /β 2a and α 1C /β 2a / α 2 δ cells.

However, the effect over lateral motor areas remained marginally significant even when posterior 8–14 Hz activity was included as a co-variate ( β =−0.068±0.038, t 20 =−1.8, P =0.09), suggesting that this motor effect was at least partially distinct from the more posterior effect.

A marginally significant trend was detected in which cerivastatin‐exposed females weighed 5% less than control females at week zero (LMM; n = 76, t = −1.74, P = 0.09; Fig. 2 A).

Individual t-tests revealed that there was marginally significant curvature in the shortest latency bin (one-tailed t-test: t(11) = 1.43, p = 0.09), and significant curvature in the second (t(11) = 2.09, p = 0.03, Cohen’s d = 0.60), third (t(11) = 3.89, p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.12), and fourth latency bin (t(11) = 2.96, p = 0.006, Cohen’s d = 0.86).

While the association between paternal education and preterm birth did not vary significantly across racial/ethnic groups [ F (9, 24,801) = 0.79; P = 0.63], we found marginally significant evidence of an interaction between paternal education and marital status [ F (3, 24,807) = 2.15; P = 0.09].

This finding was coupled with a significant negative association with mean RD values (β = −4.39E-07, p = 0.04) and a marginally significant, negative association with mean MD values (β = −3.15E-07, p = 0.09). 3.3 Heritability Per TOI, heritability of every WM parameter was estimated over its average value.